Home Blog Page 3

Oh MY God — it’s ALIVE! Monday morning links and memes

0
AIYEEEE!

Is Buffy shivering on the streets of DC?
¿Buffy está temblando en las calles de DC?

‘A creature like Donald’

Bernal: alfabetización y ciudadanía

The protesters

King's wisdom

King: From Montgomery to Memphis

Inicia el juicio por el caso Odebrecht

Ana Matilde Gómez: El caso Odebrecht

Meta form note
Is this a no-reply form note from Facebook?

US diplomats are resigning en masse

IMA ahora controlará la compra de arroz en agroferias

Chinese labor left its mark on the Panama Canal

Anton Cattle
The Panama News comes to you from barrio of Anton. set in an area with lots of cattle ranches.

 

A Isreali hostate is free

 

Cuban

 

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.
 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

la historia
 

Blue Sky

 

CUCO

 

CIAM2

 

Vote en español

 
PDC
 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

donate via PayPal

 

>

TPN on X

   

FB_2

Beluche, Una actualización la Doctrina Monroe

0
Chorrillo
La última vez que un presidente republicano ordenó un ataque contra Panamá: el fuego crece en El Chorrillo. Cientos de civiles no combatientes mueren. Foto del Departamento de Defensa del EEUU.

Las amenazas de Trump hacia el Canal de Panamá,
una actualización de la Doctrina
Monroe

por Olmedo Beluche

Desde el 21 de diciembre de 2024, en el marco de la conmemoración de los 35 años de la
última invasión militar de Estados Unidos contra Panamá (20/12/1989), el presidente
norteamericano Donald Trump, antes de haber asumido su cargo, comenzó una serie de
declaraciones reiteradas en las que amenaza con apoderarse por la fuerza del Canal de
Panamá.

Los argumentos utilizados por Trump para justificar estas pretensiones contra Panamá son
variados, pero todos falsos, y van desde la queja de que supuestamente se estarían cobrando
tarifas altas a los barcos de Estado Unidos que atraviesan el canal, hasta que el canal está
controlado por los chinos.

Una actualización de la Doctrina Monroe

Las declaraciones de Donald Trump contra el canal panameño están asociadas a otras
igualmente controversiales en las que pretende sumar a Canadá como el estado número 51
de los Estados Unidos de América, la idea de que debe adquirir Groenlandia para el control
de su país, territorio que está bajo administración de Dinamarca, o la pretensión de renombrar
el Golfo de México como “Golfo de América”.

Las propuestas sobre Panamá, Canadá, Groenlandia y el Golfo de México hacen parte de una
especie de actualización de la vieja “Doctrina Monroe” al siglo XXI por parte de Trump. El
presidente James Monroe, en 1823, emitió una declaración de política exterior
norteamericana que se ha conocido con el eslogan “América para los americanos”, que en
ese momento fue una advertencia a las monarquías europeas que habían constituido un
bloque militar denominado la “Santa Alianza”, en el sentido de que no permitiría que
reconquistaran los territorios recién independizados de Hispanoamérica. Por supuesto, desde
entonces se entendió que los “americanos” de Monroe eran ellos, Estados Unidos, no los
hispanoamericanos o latinoamericanos.

Siguiendo la Doctrina Monroe, desde el siglo XIX hasta el presente, Estados Unidos ha
actuado bajo la convicción de que América Latina y el Caribe son su “patio trasero” y zona
exclusiva de saqueo económico y neocolonialismo político. Reiteradas invasiones, golpes de
estado, sanciones económicas contra los estados que intentan zafarse (Cuba, Venezuela) así
lo demuestran, especialmente durante la Guerra Fría con la Unión Soviética. Instituciones
como la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA), el Tratado Interamericano de
Asistencia Recíproca (TIAR) y la Escuela de las Américas han sido instrumentos de esa
política exterior norteamericana.

No importa si los gobiernos norteamericanos actuaron con descarados modales imperialistas,
como lo fue bajo Teodoro Roosevelt la política del “gran garrote”, o con la hipocresía
refinada de Franklin D. Roosevelt y su “política del buen vecino”, o la llamada “doctrina de
la seguridad nacional” de la guerra fría, republicanos o demócratas, todos los gobiernos de
ese país se han guiado por la Doctrina Monroe frente a América Latina y el Caribe.

Trump una respuesta agresiva a la decadencia norteamericana y al fantasma chino

Donald Trump sabe que miente, pero no puede dejar de expresar su mayor temor cuando
afirma: “El Canal de Panamá está siendo operado por China. ¡China!… Nosotros no se lo
dimos a China. Y ellos (Panamá) han abusado. Ellos han abusado de este regalo” (La Prensa,
13/1/25).

En esas palabras está expresado el meollo del problema. La política de Trump, exterior y
comercial, intenta ser una respuesta a un proceso objetivo de decadencia económica y política
de Estados Unidos que cada vez más le cuesta competir con la influencia de los capitales
chinos. Blandir ahora el garrote contra Panamá, hace parte de su proyecto de cerrar el
mercado norteamericano, y por extensión latinoamericano, a productos chinos que compitan
con empresas norteamericanas. La intención es cortar donde pueda el avance de capitales
chinos. Estamos ante una competencia que parece evolucionar hacia una confrontación de
bloques económicos parecida a las que dieron origen a la Primera y Segunda Guerra
Mundiales.

Siendo Panamá un lugar relevante en la geopolítica mundial, a Estados Unidos le viene
preocupando la presencia china en el istmo, al menos desde 2017, cuando se normalizaron
las relaciones diplomáticas entre ambos países. Antes de eso, Panamá era parte de los
gobiernos centroamericanos sobornados por Taipei para bloquear a China. Pero hace décadas
que China es el segundo usuario del canal, después de los Estados Unidos, por lo que las
relaciones diplomáticas eran una necesidad lógica.

Le preocupa a Trump especialmente que las relaciones diplomáticas vinieron acompañadas
por varias propuestas, como la construcción de un ferrocarril hasta la frontera con Costa Rica,
proyecto que no se ha concretado, pero que enseguida fue objetado por los sectores leales a
Estados Unidos en Panamá. El ferrocarril no procedió pero empresas chinas participan en la
construcción del cuarto puente sobre el canal de Panamá y en otras obras. La hongkonesa
Hutchinson Whampoa administra los puertos junto al canal, Balboa y Cristóbal. Incluso hay
capitales chinos involucrados con canadienses en la mina Cobre Panamá, cuyo contrato fue
declarado inconstitucional luego de importantes movilizaciones populares en 2023. Chinas
son la mayoría de las mercancías que se reexportan a Sudamérica desde la Zona Libre de
Colón.

Estos hechos económicos son parte de la tendencia del mercado mundial producto de la
globalización neoliberal impuesta desde Estados Unidos hace 40 años. Pero eso no ha
convertido a Panamá en “neocolonia” del “imperialismo chino”, por el contrario, los
gobiernos panameños y la burguesía local siguen siendo títeres del imperialismo
norteamericano. Lo cual queda demostrado en su alineamiento internacional en la ONU, en
la OEA y recientemente en el caso de Venezuela.

Panamá, una historia de lucha contra la Doctrina Monroe

El Istmo de Panamá ha sido una víctima particular de la Doctrina Monroe por ser una región
estratégica para el paso entre los océanos Pacífico y Atlántico. La primera ocupación del
territorio istmeño ocurrió poco después de que Estados Unidos le robara a México la mitad
de su territorio, incluida California, en 1846. Los norteamericanos construyeron un ferrocarril
interoceánico en Panamá y de hecho la ocuparon militarmente.

A fines del siglo XIX, concluida la “Guerra del 98”, por la que EEUU le arrebató a España
sus últimas colonias en América y Asia (Cuba, Puerto Rico, Filipinas y Guam) ese país se
decidió a construir un canal que permitiera a sus fuerzas navales custodiar sus intereses
imperialistas en ambos océanos. Para lo cual procedió a separar a Panamá de Colombia,
mediante una invasión simulada, e imponer un Tratado firmado el 18 de noviembre de 1903,
por el cual se le entregaba a Estados Unidos el “derecho” de construcción, administración y
defensa del canal y un área adyacente (Zona del Canal) que sería controlada como si fuera
parte de ese país.

Una de las falacias dichas por Donald Trump es que supuestamente habrían muerto en la
construcción del canal miles de norteamericanos. Falso. Si bien los ingenieros que
construyeron el canal fueron parte ejército estadounidense, la fuerza de trabajo estuvo
constituida principalmente por obreros procedentes del Caribe, entre ellos jamaicanos,
guadalupanos, etc.

Ellos trabajaron bajo un régimen racista estilo “apartheid”, que separaba física y socialmente
a los anglosajones blancos de las “razas de color”, incluso salarialmente. Según reportes de
la propia Isthmian Canal Comission, durante la construcción del canal (1903-1914)
fallecieron 5,611 trabajadores, de los cuales solo 350 eran ciudadanos de Estados Unidos, el
equivalente al 6% del total (La Prensa 16/1/25).

El pueblo panameño luchó durante el siglo XX contra el enclave colonial de la Zona del
Canal, y por revertir la administración del canal a Panamá. A lo largo de la centuria, cada
generación istmeña protagonizó diversas revueltas populares y enfrentamientos con la
soldadesca norteamericana. El reclamo sobre la nacionalización del Canal de Panamá cobró
fuerza a partir de 1956, cuando en Egipto el presidente Nasser nacionalizó el Canal de Suez.
Estos reclamos tuvieron su momento culminante el 9 de enero de 1964, cuando un grupo de
estudiantes panameños que fueron a la Zona del Canal a exigir que se izara la bandera
nacional junto a la norteamericana, como símbolo de soberanía sobre ese territorio. Los
estudiantes fueron agredidos por la policía y los habitantes norteamericanos de la Zona del
Canal. Ante esos hechos el pueblo empezó a acudir en masa a la cerca que dividía la ciudad
panameña de la norteamericana para plantar banderas, lo que fue respondido por disparos del
ejército de Estados Unidos.

Los hechos se transformaron en una pequeña revolución anticolonial que duró tres días, que
causó más de 20 muertos y 500 heridos del lado panameño, y la destrucción de propiedades
norteamericanas. A partir de entonces fue evidente que había que negociar un nuevo tratado
sobre el canal que resolviera las “causas del conflicto”: fin del enclave canalero,
administración panameña del canal y eliminación de las bases militares yanquis. Esto
condujo a la firma de los Tratados de 1977, entre el general Omar Torrijos y el presidente
James Carter.

Un canal administrado por Panamá desde el año 2000

En la década de 1980, ya en proceso de reversión del canal a manos panameñas, se produjo
una grave crisis política y económica, entre cuya complejidad estaba la discusión de cómo
Panamá iba a administrar el canal y cómo se deberían utilizar los recursos adyacentes,
principalmente puertos. Aunque la promesa de Omar Torrijos había sido darle “el mayor uso
colectivo posible”, el sector burgués en torno al general Manuel Noriega pretendía
convertirlo en una gran base militar sustituyendo los cuarteles norteamericanos por
panameños. Pero otro sector de la burguesía panameña discrepaba y planeaba la privatización
de las áreas revertidas.

La invasión de 1989 le permitió a Estados Unidos reconfigurar el país a su beneficio con la
complicidad de la burguesía panameña. En 1994 se impuso una reforma constitucional que
dio al canal una Junta Directiva controlada por la oligarquía financiera y comercial panameña
que excluyó cualquier participación popular en las decisiones, aunque se definió a la
Autoridad del Canal de Panamá (ACP) como una entidad pública.

Se transfirieron instalaciones y desmantelaron las bases militares a partir del año 2000 pero,
en vez de “entrar al canal” como Torrijos había prometido, el pueblo panameño fue testigo
pasivo del proceso de apropiación y privatizaciones de las áreas adyacentes y los puertos.
Los dos principales puertos, Balboa y Cristóbal, fueron entregados a la empresa Hutchinson
Whampoa, con sede en Hong Kong. Otros puertos han sido entregados a otras empresas con
capitales extranjeros y panameños.

Durante estos años ha habido un reclamo permanente de las organizaciones sociales y
populares panameñas respecto a la forma cómo se administra el canal, se asignan sus recursos
y la privatización de lo que fuera la Zona del Canal. Estos reclamos fueron especialmente
fuertes en 2007 cuando se aprobó una costosa ampliación de las esclusas para permitir el
paso de enormes barcos de contenedores.

Pese a ello, el canal está manejado por unos 8,500 trabajadores panameños y representa entre
el 6 y el 8 % del producto interno bruto del país. En términos absolutos, el canal de Panamá
ha entregado al tesoro público en 24 años de administración panameña 28,232 millones de
dólares que, comparados con los escasos 1,879 millones que recibió el país desde 1914 a
1999, cuando estuvo bajo administración norteamericana, demuestran que la lucha por la
soberanía sí produjo réditos concretos.

Por eso, pese a las diferencias internas sobre la administración del canal, las declaraciones
de Donald Trump produjeron una casi unánime respuesta por parte de la nación panameña,
de rechazo y defensa del canal panameño. Tuvo que condenar las palabras de Trump hasta el
presidente José R. Mulino, tradicional aliado derechista de los intereses norteamericanos,
quien fue vicecanciller del gobierno impuesto por la invasión del 20 de diciembre de 1989.

El gobierno y la burguesía panameños serán inconsecuentes en la defensa del canal

Pese a las declaraciones altisonantes de Mulino y otros políticos de la burguesía panameña
frente a Donald Trump, el pueblo panameño debe desconfiar, pues históricamente la
burguesía y sus políticos han actuado como lacayos del imperialismo yanqui. Así pasó en
1903, cuando traicionaron y avalaron el tratado que creó el enclave colonial, así actuaron
durante el siglo XX en cada momento crítico de la historia nacional. Baste recordar la crisis
de la década de 1980 y su colaboración con las tropas invasoras.

Mientras Trump no descartaba el uso de la fuerza militar para retomar el Canal de Panamá,
el presidente Mulino se arrastraba ante los intereses imperialistas norteamericanos no solo
dando legitimidad al candidato perdedor de las elecciones venezolanas, el ultraderechista
Edmundo González, sino que hasta se propuso de custodio de las supuestas “actas”. Pésima
jugada táctica divisionista que socava apoyo continental a nuestro país en el momento en que
más lo necesita.

¿Cómo enfrentar a Trump? Unidad y movilización popular latinoamericana

Una cosa es lo que Donald Trump desea hacer y otra es lo que podrá hacer. El proyecto de la
ultraderecha imperialista norteamericana pretende aumentar las cadenas y la explotación de
los pueblos del mundo, en particular de este continente. Porque es la respuesta desesperada
a la crisis del sistema capitalista global. Para ello están dispuestos a sumir al mundo en
guerras, sangre y sufrimientos. Así lo han demostrado recientemente en el genocidio contra
el pueblo palestino en Gaza, en las guerras del medio Oriente y en Ucrania.

Pero el otro factor de la realidad son los pueblos, la clase trabajadora y los oprimidos, que no
son actores pasivos, sino que luchan activamente por defender sus vidas frente a los embates
del sistema. Así que el resultado final está por verse. Trump puede ser vencido. De hecho en
su gobierno anterior fue vencido por el movimiento “las vidas negras importan”.

Cualquier intento de retomar el canal por la fuerza por parte de Estados Unidos será
respondido por el pueblo panameño con firmeza cuyo ejemplo se ilumina en los mártires del
9 de enero de 1964. Con el apoyo de los pueblos del mundo y en especial de Latinoamérica
y el Caribe.

En este continente nos toca reactualizar la doctrina de la unidad latinoamericana promovida
por el Libertador Simón Bolívar frente a la reactualización de la Doctrina Monroe. En el año
2026 se cumplirán 200 años (1826), cuado Bolívar convocó en Panamá un Congreso
Anfictiónico para concretar la unidad de nuestros países frente a las amenazas de la Santa
Alianza y de la Doctrina Monroe norteamericana. Es hora de volver a convocarnos.

Manifestantes estudiantiles en 1964. A lo largo de varias generaciones, a través de varias fases, el Canal de Panamá y sus alrededores son cosas que los panameños y sus antepasados ​​construyeron, lucharon y murieron.

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.
 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

la historia
 

>  

Blue Sky

 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM2

 

Vote en español

¿Wappin? Music so greasy you should put it in your hair

0

Classic gearhead stuff

Cosas para los fanáticos de los engranajes

Sha Na Na – Teen Angel
https://youtu.be/lp2eELohkNs?si=SJvOXg6_TNMlWeje

The Hondells – Little Honda
https://youtu.be/IHmRxpumtB4?si=mvdBKl5se0jWnEVW

J Frank Wilson and the Cavaliers – Last Kiss
https://youtu.be/bh4se9YMV3A?si=WjZPrSeXhOlcXbMu

The Cars – My Best Friend’s Girl
https://youtu.be/j-dfrHkaXuE?si=2OJKlq55IUnsmGgl

Frank Zappa – Any Way the Wind Blows
https://youtu.be/JpbYkgpKSN4?si=L2BjrBIZGqjtlMkU

The Astronauts – The Hearse
https://youtu.be/oUjfauStrDQ?si=d515vNFas3Qgl51z

The Highwaymen – Ghost Riders in the Sky
https://youtu.be/nOWjX4BpC24?si=WnDt-covDpuP94AW

Alice Playten – Pizza Man
https://youtu.be/Ak5BvRYBPVo?si=yELcxBXsr2XJGjCv

Jan and Dean – Dead Man’s Curve
https://youtu.be/yrCuMPeSu9s?si=aRx7LLZeZgCia4SR

Contact us by email at thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

risks taken

   

>

Blue Sky

 
PDC

 

 

>

TPN on X

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

Kouddous: Gazans celebrate the ceasefire, but…

0

Five journalists in Gaza reflect on the ceasefire announcement

translated by Sharif Abdel Kouddous

“These were moments mixed with joy and sorrow. Joy that this waterfall of blood will stop; that the massacres will stop; that the sentence, ‘this family has been completely erased’ will stop; that the phrase ‘he is the sole survivor’ will stop; that the words ‘the martyrs’ bodies are in the streets and no one is able to remove them,’ will stop; that all of this suffering will become a memory.”

Those are the words of Hossam Shabat, a Palestinian journalist who has been covering Israel’s genocidal war from northern Gaza. As Palestinians took to the streets to celebrate the announcement of the “ceasefire” deal on Wednesday, the Israeli military ramped up its bombing of Gaza, killing scores of civilians. At least 77 Palestinians have been killed since dawn Thursday morning, the director of the information center at the Ministry of Health in Gaza, Dr. Zaher al-Wahaidi, told Drop Site News, and 81 killed in the 24 hours prior to that.

Nearly 47,000 Palestinians have been killed in the 468 days of Israel’s assault on Gaza, according to the ministry of health, a figure that is almost certainly a massive undercount, and over 110,000 have been injured. Israel has destroyed vast swathes of the Gaza Strip and forcibly displaced nearly all of Gaza’s population.

Among those killed by the Israeli military are more than 200 journalists, an unprecedented number. The journalists in Gaza who have managed to survive are suffering many of the same horrors of the people they are covering — they have lost family members and friends, they have been displaced multiple times, they are hungry and exhausted — yet they manage to continue to report.

In the hours after the ceasefire agreement was announced, Drop Site reached out to journalists in different parts of Gaza to ask for their reaction to the news. They responded either by voice note or in writing over WhatsApp in Arabic and English. Their responses have been lightly edited for clarity.

Hossam Shabat, Gaza City. A 23-year-old journalist from Beit Hanoun, Hossam has been displaced over 20 times and was wounded in an Israeli airstrike in November. He is among six Al Jazeera journalists the Israeli military has publicly accused of being terrorists in what has been described as a hit list.

We have been waiting for this moment for over a year and three months. We have been waiting for the moment when we could broadcast the news of a ceasefire, for the end of this waterfall of blood. Just minutes before the official announcement, the injured who were at Al-Ahli hospital were celebrating around us. We were waiting for the ceasefire and this announcement as we imprisoned our tears in joy at the news.

These were moments mixed with joy and sorrow. Joy that this waterfall of blood will stop; that the massacres will stop; that the sentence, “this family has been completely erased” will stop; that the phrase “he is the sole survivor” will stop; that the words “the martyrs’ bodies are in the streets and no one is able to remove them,” will stop; that all of this suffering will become a memory. This was the basis of our joy. It was also the basis of our sorrow over the martyrs – we bid farewell to over 50,000 martyrs, there are also tens of thousands of wounded, there are the prisoners, all the other kinds of suffering. God willing, all of this is in the past and won’t return and this will become a memory.

We documented the joy of people here, and we were surprised when we witnessed the response of people here with their celebration, and fireworks and chanting and with the embracing of journalists. They carried us on their shoulders, and they celebrated us and they showed their pride in our work. We are not heroes, we just did our duty as best we could.

The worry now is the period between the announcement of the ceasefire and its implementation, which is in three days. What is typical is that the occupation army in such times tries to erase people’s joy. So now, it is madness – they are using warplanes to bomb civilians’ houses and tents. At this moment, the tents in south Gaza are burning. At this moment, there are tens of martyrs under homes in Sheikh Radwan and no one can pull them out. This is what people were afraid of — that the ceasefire would be announced and the occupation army would go crazy and would commit even more massacres. Right now, as I am speaking there are more than 30 martyrs lying in the courtyard of Al-Ahli hospital, in this area that since the beginning of the Israeli aggression war up until this moment has not stopped. We had hoped that we would see this area empty of martyrs, but the ones who were celebrating the ceasefire have now become martyrs. This is what people were afraid of.

Shrouq Aila, Deir al-Balah. A 30-year-old journalist from Gaza City. Her husband, journalist Roshdi Sarraj, was killed in an Israeli airstrike on their home in October of 2023. He ran Ain Media, which Aila now heads. In 2024, Aila received the International Press Freedom Award from the Committee to Protect Journalists.

How do I feel? To be honest, there is a lot of fear because the occupation has lost it. They are bombing in a crazy way. You remain afraid, you are not safe, you don’t know what is happening. And they betray, they have always been able to betray.

It’s a time of uncertainty and devastation and happiness at the same time. Mixed feelings. Heartbreak and relief, negative and positive. A combination of these feelings. But really, the uncertainty is looming around us. It’s not only me, it’s all around, because they have been bombing since the ceasefire announcement was made.

My personal feeling is that I’m terrified because, firstly, I’m not ready to accept the reality that everything is gone in the north. That my husband and home are gone. I’m super excited to get back to the north but at the same time, I don’t want to go back to the north. That’s what I mean by mixed feelings. But the most important thing is for the killing to stop. The healing process is going to take time, not only for me but for all Palestinians in Gaza. And at least we can begin the stage of healing, otherwise we will remain stuck in the denial stage under genocide. So we take a baby step with this ceasefire and then everyone can begin to grieve.

Bilal Salem, Gaza City. A 37-year-old journalist from Gaza City. He is a member of the Salem family who have lost over 270 members in different Israeli attacks.

My feelings when I heard the announcement — I saw the happiness of people and their tears of joy. But with regard to myself, as a journalist and a human being and a Palestinian who lives in north Gaza, I have contradictory feelings ranging from joy to sorrow. I lost nearly 250 members of my family. Relatives of relatives: my nephews, nieces, aunts, their sons and daughters, my uncles and their wives and children. I lost a very large number of people. We are one of the families that has the highest number of martyrs in this genocidal war.

I felt happy because we were always hoping the war would end. I am happy because the waterfall of blood will stop. I am happy that there will be no more hunger. I am happy because there is an ongoing tragedy that needs to end. Even if this is the least of all rights, the waterfall of blood needs to stop.

My wish as a journalist and as a Palestinian who lives in north Gaza is that everything goes smoothly and the bombing stops, because last night was very very bad, especially for us in the north of the Gaza Strip. I didn’t expect to live to be honest, it was very terrifying and very frightening. I hope there will be pressure on the occupation to stop committing all these massacres and to stop all this bombing, and to end this fear and terror for young and old alike.

I also want to add that the displaced in the south will head to the north and this is something we have been waiting for. We have family and relatives in the south. I am in the north and they are in the south and we have been waiting for them for over a year. So God willing we will see them safe and in good health.

Rasha Abou Jalal, Deir al-Balah. She reported on social issues for the local newspaper Istiklal for six years and was a jury member for the annual Gaza Strip press freedom event Press House in 2016.

Since the beginning of the war, I have been displaced more than nine times, escaping the bombing and searching for water and food sources. I am speaking to you today from a small tent in Deir al-Balah, where I, like other displaced people, am trying to understand my mixed feelings after the announcement of the ceasefire agreement.

Our feelings today are mixed. The night of the ceasefire announcement was full of happiness, with whistles filling the sky and people congratulating each other with great joy. However, this joy is mixed with great anxiety. The war has left nothing untouched. There is fear of the unknown, fear of continued suffering due to the massive destruction in Gaza, which has reached 83% of the Gaza Strip according to official Palestinian data, and fear that this calm will be temporary.

As displaced people, we dream of a simple return to the most basic necessities of life. We dream of a home that contains us, even if it is just modest walls. We dream of safety for our children, who have lived the most difficult days of their lives, and a real opportunity to build a better future.

But let’s be honest, the reality is very difficult. We lost our homes, our loved ones, our money. We fear being left alone to face all these challenges.

Many people here feel relieved that they will not have to flee the bombing every moment after the ceasefire comes into effect, but I also see the fear in their eyes. There are many questions: When will our homes be rebuilt? How will we rebuild our lives?

As a citizen, a displaced person, and a journalist, I want to emphasize that this war has proven that we are stronger than we think, and that hope is what keeps us steadfast. We hope that this agreement will be the beginning of a lasting peace, that every displaced person will have the opportunity to return to their homes, and that the page of wars will be turned in the history of our children.

This war ends and I have left in my memory as a journalist, more than 200 journalists who were killed by the Israeli army because of their work in conveying the Palestinian narrative to the world. To those journalist soldiers, you have the utmost respect from your people.

Abubaker Abed, Deir al-Balah. A 22-year-old journalist from Deir al-Balah who was a sports journalist before Israel’s genocidal assault began and has contributed multiple articles to Drop Site News.

The ceasefire announcement was a temporary reprieve from the hell we’ve been through, but it hasn’t secured anything for us. We’ll just go back to the same Gaza, that tiny, war-torn strip of land where over two million people and I will be subjugated, suffocated, occupied, and hurt. This won’t usher in anything pleasant for us but maybe in the long-awaited liberation. As a journalist, I’ve been doing the impossible to report. I never stopped even though I was pained and traumatized. I feel that the ceasefire is just a mental game to play on our feelings and keep us trapped in a bubble of unendurable suffering, which I have always dreamt of bursting.

I was 20 when I began reporting on this genocide; now I am 22. My hope is to be free, to be like any 22-year-old around the world. I have documented the most horrifying scenes and the most excruciating stories. Although I was a football reporter and had to evolve into a war correspondent, I kept speaking the truth at the top of my lungs and sharing our tragedies with a world that has let us down for the last 15 months. Reporting on a genocide goes way beyond journalism. It’s blending your agony with others’ anguish.

After the announcement, everyone in my area was happy that they would be heading back to their houses because this has always been their ultimate dream. They were elated and excited and couldn’t wait for Sunday. But some of those who were celebrating were killed and headed to a tiny graveyard among thousands of others in our increasingly inundated cemetery in Deir al-Balah. A lot of people, like my cousins who were displaced from northern Gaza since the start of the war, don’t want to only go home but to first bury their loved ones if they manage to find their bodies. Others want this to end because they haven’t yet grieved and absorbed the heartbreak. I am one of them. I still can’t believe that my very dearest friend was killed, my aunt’s family was wiped out, and that my colleagues are still under the rubble. I am quite simply traumatized.

Let me just tell you one thing: I still walk with a huge pang in my heart that Gaza has become the main haven while we always yearned to free our occupied hometowns. I will fight with my words now and forever to capture this moment. If it’s not for me, it’s for the coming generations. Our 77-year plight that has stalked every meter of Gaza will reflect eternal peace and freedom one day.

Contact us by email at thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

risks taken

 

 

>

Blue Sky

 
PDC

 

 

>

TPN on X

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

Ben-Meir, Common sense about climate change

0
firefighters
A wildfire. Nothing new, but the scale of what LA has been fighting is unprecedented. Shutterstock photo.

Addressing climate change strengthens rather than stifles economic growth

by Alon Ben-Meir

The sweeping wildfires in Los Angeles are just another horrific manifestation of the rapidly increasing and deadly effects of climate change. Those who deny that there is such a thing as climate change are misguided and can cause further incalculable environmental damage, especially if they hold a position of power like Trump, from which they could stop or impede efforts to curb the immense harm inflicted on our planet by climate change. Trump, who champions economic growth, should revisit the effects of climate change and look into the vast opportunities for massive economic growth that can be harnessed by addressing climate change, through creating new businesses and millions of jobs to produce clean energy.

As of January 14, the Los Angeles wildfires have already killed 25 individuals (including 17 in the Eaton fire and 8 in the Palisades fire) and so far may cost a staggering $250 to $275 billion. Over 12,000 structures were obliterated in a disaster considered one of the deadliest fires in American history. In the Pacific Palisades alone, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) reports that 5,316 structures have been damaged or destroyed. These numbers are expected to rise as the fires continue to rage.

Those who claim that climate change is a hoax cannot deny many undisputable facts provided by several scientific disciplines based on decades of research and glaring evidence, including melting glaciers and ice sheets, rising sea levels, changes in plant and animal behavior, and a global temperature which rose roughly 1° C since 1880. This number, which seems small, is vastly significant—economically, a 2017 study found that for every degree Celsius increase in global warming, the US risks losing 2.3 percent of its GDP.

Before we delve, however, into the prospect of economic growth from developing new industries that address climate change, it is essential to point out the colossal damage and fatalities caused by just six devastating events over the past four years alone, among many other disastrous climate-change-related storms in the United States.

In August 2020, Hurricane Laura was a powerful category 4 hurricane that produced storm surges over 15 feet and historic wind speeds of 150 mph, the highest since 1856. It caused 42 deaths and $28.1 billion in damages.

Climate change deniers, including President Trump, insist that there is no such thing as climate change and that measures taken to combat it only decrease economic productivity and stifle growth. In fact, the opposite is true; a plethora of scientific evidence suggests that such measures increase overall productivity and create millions of new jobs, which Trump should embrace.

From August to December 2020, massive firestorms across California, Oregon, and Washington caused 46 deaths and $19.9 billion in damages. The fires destroyed several small towns and produced injurious air quality, from which millions suffered for months.

Hurricane Ida, which occurred in August 2021, claimed 96 lives and cost a staggering $84.6 billion in damages. The storm swept from Louisiana to New York and is considered somewhere between the fifth- and seventh-costliest tropical storm.

In February 2021, a historic cold wave and winter storm stretching across most of the United States caused 262 deaths and $27.2 billion in damages, the costliest winter storm on record. Texas was the most affected state by this storm, with the majority of deaths (210) occurring there.

In September 2024, category 4 Hurricane Helene struck Florida’s Big Bend region with winds that topped 140 mph. The cyclone caused a whopping $78.7 billion in damage and claimed 219 lives. It produced a storm surge of over 15 feet and a historic rainfall of over 30 inches, precipitating massive flooding in western North Carolina.

Finally, in October 2024, Hurricane Milton, a category 3 storm that rapidly evolved into category 5, killed 32 and cost nearly $35 billion in damage. It made landfall in Florida and produced a score of tornadoes, compounding damage from Helene.

These six climate change-related storms, plus the LA fires, caused the deaths of 722 and cost more than $523 billion in damages, coupled with the unimaginable pain and anguish of thousands who lost a loved one and the hundreds of thousands who suffered from dislocations and the torturous and costly process of rebuilding their lives.

Although fires and hurricanes are natural phenomena and will still occur, climate change has fueled their intensity and frequency, creating larger death tolls and costing billions more in reconstruction. Imagine how many clean energy businesses could be created if only half of the $523 billion in damages caused by these catastrophes were invested in the clean energy industry.

The time is overdue for those who still believe that climate change is a hoax to realize that climate change is real and cannot be slowed down or reversed on its own. Future climate change-related storms and fires will only worsen and at an escalating cost in trillions and deaths by tens of thousands. They must also recognize that addressing climate change aggressively and consistently will not hurt businesses, specifically in the fossil oil and gas production sectors, but to the contrary. It will create new businesses dedicated to producing clean energy in which oil and gas companies can play a significant role, for example, through managing supply chains for renewable energy, and make even more profits.

The USA has the resources and scientific know-how to build new and expand current industries that produce clean energy. At this particular juncture, the incoming Trump administration needs to provide federal funding in collaboration with the states to invest in clean energy industries.

This includes advanced battery production to manufacture iron-air batteries for long-duration energy storage, green hydrogen production, building advanced nuclear technology, which is believed to play a significant role in meeting rising power demand, vastly expanding solar manufacturing capability, dramatically increasing all-new utility-generating capacity, and building wind turbine manufacturing facilities both onshore and offshore. Finally, expanding the manufacturing of electric cars and more energy-efficient transportation could dramatically reduce carbon emissions.

The purpose behind all these efforts is not only to hold the increase in global average temperature above preindustrial levels to 1.5° C as stipulated by the Paris Agreement, but also to produce a dramatic increase in job creation. According to the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs report, new innovations will create many new job opportunities in the clean energy sectors that would not only offset job losses resulting from limiting the use of fossil oil and gas but add millions of new jobs at a net increase of 78 million jobs.

Scores of Republicans in the House and Senate would support a national initiative to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in clean energy if Trump signaled that he would support such legislation without necessarily simultaneously mandating new restrictions on the fossil fuel and gas industry. Given Trump’s powerful political sway among Republicans and his mercurial nature, he can change his mind as he has done many times without facing serious opposition from many lawmakers to pass such legislation. And, in this regard, he can count on the near-unanimous support of Democrats.

Many would disagree and insist that given Trump’s public position on climate change, there is little or no chance that he will change his mind. Maybe so. They should remember, however, that Trump is not a staunch Republican ideologue. He is not dogmatic and would embrace climate change legislation if it guarantees the expansion of the economy and the creation of millions of new jobs, which is at the heart of his economic agenda.

Dr. Alon Ben-Meir is a retired professor of international relations, most recently at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU.

Contact us by email at thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

risks taken

 

 

 

>

Blue Sky

 
PDC

 

 

>

TPN on X

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

The Panama News blog links and memes, January 16 2025

0

Slow news time in Panama, hot air from the north
Noticias lentas en Panamá, aire caliente del norte

Trump’s blacklist

Padilla questions Bondi

Aponte antes del fin de su misión

¿Úlitma hora en la guerra en Gaza?

From Zuck’s intern to fierce competitor

Bowzer

Duckworth to Hegseth: ‘You’re not qualified’

Buses en ´paro militante’ tras ataque a conductor

Biden’s Cuba bombshell shocks Florida Democrats

Popularidad y optimismo en la gestión de Mulino, a la baja

music

Gran muelle “multiusos” en el Pacífico cerca de frontera con Costa Rica

Sólo un tercio de los hidrantes de Bella Vista está en buenas condiciones

Sheinbaum: reconstrucción de Los Ángeles requerirá de mano de obra mexicana

Octavia

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.
 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

la historia
 

Blue Sky

 

CUCO

 

CIAM2

 

Vote en español

 
PDC
 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

donate via PayPal

 

>

TPN on X

   

FB_2

Castro-Rodríguez, Meta (Facebook): lots of fake news and misinformation

0
running dogs of imperialism, gone full MAGA
Hustlers gone full MAGA, running wild. Graphic by geralt — pixabay.com.

A turn for the worse

by Manuel Castro-Rodríguez

Meta  the company that operates Facebook, Instagram, Threads and WhatsApp  announced on Tuesday it was ending third-party fact-checking. In a video, the company’s chief, Mark Zuckerberg, said fact checking had led to “too much censorship”.

In a statement reacting to Meta’s decision, the head of the International Fact-Checking Network, Angie Drobnic Holan, said (emphasis is mine):

This decision will hurt social media users who are looking for accurate, reliable information to make decisions about their everyday lives and interactions with friends and family. Fact-checking journalism has never censored or removed posts; it’s added information and context to controversial claims, and it’s debunked hoax content and conspiracy theories. The fact-checkers used by Meta follow a Code of Principles requiring nonpartisanship and transparency. It’s unfortunate that this decision comes in the wake of extreme political pressure from a new administration and its supporters. Factcheckers have not been biased in their work — that attack line comes from those who feel they should be able to exaggerate and lie without rebuttal or contradiction.

Meta launched its independent, third-party, fact-checking program in 2016. It did so during a period of heightened concern about information integrity coinciding with the election of Donald Trump as US president and furor about the role of social media platforms in spreading misinformation and disinformation.

As part of the program, Meta funded fact-checking partners  such as Reuters Fact Check, Australian Associated Press, Agence France-Presse and PolitiFact  to independently assess the validity of problematic content posted on its platforms. Warning labels were then attached to any content deemed to be inaccurate or misleading. This helped users to be better informed about the content they were seeing online.

Facebook to ditch fact-checking: what do researchers think?

Meta’s planned shift away from third party fact-checking in favor of a crowdsourced approach has perplexed those who study the spread of misinformation.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00027-0

Could Meta ending fact-checking lead to rise in health misinformation?

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/meta-ending-fact-checking-lead-rise-health-misinformation/story?id=117480644

Calling women ‘household objects’ now permitted on Facebook after Meta updated its guidelines

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/tech/meta-hateful-conduct-policy-update-fact-check/index.html

Under Meta’s relaxed hate speech rules, users can now post “I’m a proud racist” or “Black people are more violent than whites.”

https://theintercept.com/2025/01/09/facebook-instagram-meta-hate-speech-content-moderation/

Meta scraps fact-checking, brings back political content in latest Trump-friendly move

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/07/meta-eliminates-third-party-fact-checking-moves-to-community-notes.html

No more fact-checking for Meta. How will this change media — and the pursuit of truth?

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-politics-trump-verification-misinformation-00bc57b4a3c348a1363610c1cbbfd8ca

Mark Zuckerberg’s geopolitical free speech gambit

The Meta CEO’s US political changes will have complicated global consequence.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/01/10/mark-zuckerberg-meta-fact-check-hate-speech-trump/

Why did Mark Zuckerberg end Facebook and Instagram’s factchecking program?

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/07/why-did-mark-zuckerberg-end-facebook-instagram-fact-checking

Mark Zuckerberg’s MAGA makeover will reshape the entire internet

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/media/mark-zuckerberg-meta-fact-checking-analysis/index.html

Facebook owner Meta kills DEI in latest nod to Trump and MAGA movement

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/01/10/meta-cancels-dei/77598458007/

Inside Mark Zuckerberg’s sprint to remake Meta for the Trump era

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/technology/meta-mark-zuckerberg-trump.html

Contact us by email at thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

risks taken

 

 

 

>

Blue Sky

 
PDC

 

 

>

TPN on X

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

The Panama News links and memes blog for January 11, 2025

0
Mill Polleras

La deuda del 9 de enero

Caricatura El Siglo 9 de enero

Avanza proceso del
teleférico

Meta has ‘heard the message’ from Trump, says whistleblower Frances Haugen

A lot of people are searching for how to delete Facebook and Instagram

TikTok fights looming ban in US Supreme Court

Alternate to THEM
The editor of The Panama News is locked out of Facebook, with specious MAGA arguments that since his US passport includes his middle name and his Panamanian cédula contains both that and his maternal surname in the Spanish style, it does not match the name on the account, “Eric Jackson.” Others are posting on his Facebook wall, which is still up, generally with his blessing., but the editor has joined the migration to Bluesky. There are problems with that platform, too, mostly created by malicious saboteurs and prostitutes who look at it as a new way to advertise themselves. Some 15 million people have gone to Bluesky since the November US elections and their moderation team is only slowly sorting out the mess, starting with a purge of bots. Given what’s happened to Facebook and X, it’s worth it to sign up for Bluesky.

Opening the DNC’s black box

Nicolás Maduro arremete contra el presidente de Panamá

Lessons of a twice-rescued Torah

Judge Cannon again

Appeals court declines to block release of special counsel report on Trump

reservation voting reduced

El primer desafío de Gutiérrez al frente de la Selección Femenina Sub-20

Internet users mock Marjorie Taylor Greene’s bill to rename the Gulf of Mexico


‘Pizzagate’ gunman killed by police in North Carolina after traffic stop

Elon Musk and far-right German leader agree ‘Hitler was a Communist’

Bowzer

Ogaret: International law has collapsed, and journalism along with it

Actividad comercial en la Zona Libre de Colón se contrae 24,7 % en 2024

‘No exceptions’ for commercial US ships passing through the Panama Canal

Teitel: MAGA goes to Panama


NY Daily News cartoon

Maduro aislado en su tercer mandato

El camino de las personas con descapacidad en Panamá

SUNTRACS suspende huelga en la Línea 3 del Metro

Peter Thiel: ‘beyond nuts’

G7: Maduro falta legitimidad

Protesters in Panama burn Trump effigy

Mulino threatens to take Trump to UN Security Council

voting rights

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.
 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

la historia
 

>  

Blue Sky

 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM2

 

Vote en español

¿Wappin? Este 9 de enero / This January 9th

0
Kids those days

Make and keep the peace, but do not forget
Haz y mantén la paz, pero no la olvides

Sui Generis – Deambulando

Connie Talbot – I Need You Like a Cigarette

Mix Tamborito 2018

Danny Rivera & Yomira John – Concierto Siempre Amigos

Julieta Venegas – Zócalo de la CDMX

Frank Zappa – Later That Night

Shakira – Empire

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.
 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

la historia
 

Blue Sky

 

CUCO

 

CIAM2

 

Vote en español

 
PDC
 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

donate via PayPal

 

>