Home Blog Page 49

El Estado y sus contratistas: Un anuncio que plantea más interrogantes

0
Agosto de 2020: una mancha en la Bahía de Panamá que emana del Río Matasnillo. Foto por MiAmbiente.
anuncio

 

Nota del redactor: Al parecer, el plan es convertir la parte baja del río Matasnillo en una alcantarilla, con pozos sépticos instalados a lo largo de su curso. Sin embargo, el gobierno no está revelando muchos detalles sobre exactamente lo que pretende hacer.

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.
 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

la historia
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM2

 

Tweet

 

Vote en español

“The indictment” (among others) / “El acta de acusación” (entre otros)

0
MAGAts
Crowd of Trump supporters marching on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021, ultimately leading the building being breached and several deaths. Wikimedia photo by TapTheForwardAssist.
Multitud de partidarios de Trump marchando en el Capitolio del EEUU el 6 de enero de 2021, lo que finalmente provocó la violación del edificio y varias muertes. Foto de Wikimedia por TapTheForwardAssist.

“These claims were false, and the Defendant knew that they were false”
“Estas afirmaciones eran falsas y el acusado sabía que eran falsas”

Read the whole indictment (in English and in PDF format) HERE.

Desde España (RTVE)

Resumen por los cubanos, utilizando material de la decadente burguesa AP

Resumen por CNN en español

enemies of the people
¿Promete perdonarlos por esto y por más crímenes que puedan cometer si vuelve a ser presidente? Ficha del FBI.
Is he promising to pardon them for this, and for more crimes that they might commit if he becomes president again? FBI poster.

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

Dog Days nowCIAM2

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

Vote en español

 
PDC
 
Dinero2

Ukraine War: US democratic socialists debate what it is to be anti-imperialist

0
kaBOOM
The Ukraine War has been ongoing since 2014, when Russia started to arm secessionist forces seeking to dismember Ukraine. Ukrainian Defense Ministry photo.

Ukraine and consistent anti-imperialism

by Bill Fletcher Jr. et al

An open letter to our Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) comrades:

DSA is about to make the terrible mistake of breaking with over 100 years of solidarity with colonial peoples in their struggles against imperialism and with solidarity with the oppressed in their fight for democracy.

Since 2014, Russia has waged a war of aggression against its former colony of Ukraine, seizing Crimea in 2014, organizing separatist movements in Donetsk and Luhansk, and then since February 24, 2022 launching a full-scale war. This is an openly annexationist invasion with a genocidal trajectory, which the Ukrainian people are resisting for the survival of their nation. The Russian war has involved atrocities such as the massacre of civilian populations and the kidnapping of thousands of children.

For over 100 years revolutionary, democratic socialists have supported the right of nations to self-determination, placing ourselves on the side of the people of Algeria, Vietnam, Cuba and many African nations as they fought anti-colonial wars.

Revolutionary, democratic socialists have always supported their right to get arms from wherever they could to fight for their national sovereignty against imperial powers.

This is not the first time that the objectives of imperial powers and socialists have coincided. During World War II, many people in France, Italy, and Poland, including many on the left, rose up to fight against the Nazis. They sought and (to some extent) received arms and materials from the Allies. The United States sent arms to Tito and the Yugoslav partisans fighting the German occupation, and to the Viet Minh in their fight for national liberation against Japan; and we think that’s a good thing. We took the same position on the right of Hungarians in 1956, Czechs and Slovaks in 1968, and Poles in 1980 to establish their own governments free from the domination, and in two of those cases, the military intervention of the Soviet Union. Revolutionary, democratic socialists support for the right to self-determination was offered independently of the political character of the former colonial states.

Now, DSA appears to be prepared in the case of Ukraine to break with this long history of support for oppressed people. The failure to support Ukraine implies permitting Russia to win its imperialist war, to conquer Ukraine in part or in whole, and to impose on the conquered territory Vladimir Putin’s brutal authoritarian rule that denies democratic rights to its citizens, its workers, LGBTQ people, and ethnic minorities. Putin also wants to suppress Ukrainian language and culture, which is why his army has looted museums and stolen children.

While Ukraine has been receiving military weapons from the United States and NATO countries, no one has forced the Ukrainians to fight this war, nor could they. The Ukrainians fight for their country of their own free will, and at the direction of their elected leadership. This is not a proxy-war between great powers, but rather a war of national self-determination by an imperfect and neoliberal democracy against an imperialist state. Our socialist principles in support of national self-determination and democracy everywhere should place us on the side of Ukraine.

It’s a basic principle of anti-imperialist politics that “our main enemy is at home,” meaning in our case US imperialism and its allies, with all the monstrous crimes against humanity perpetrated by US policies, in our name. However, that has never meant seeing “the other side,” e.g. today’s powers of China or Russia as the main US imperial rivals, as “progressive” in any sense or viewing their crimes as a lesser evil or simply a response to US “provocation.” Consequently, we should oppose the Consensus Resolution #4: International Committee Consensus Resolution as well as the Socialist Anti-Militarism and the War in Ukraine (Amendment to CR #4 (IC)] amendment both of which violate these principles.

Another amendment to the International Committee’s resolution, the Consensus Resolution Amendment C: For a Class-Struggle Internationalism (Amendment to CR #4 (IC)), while recognizing the importance of democratic rights and self-determination of nations in the abstract, avoids the burning question of which side socialists should be on when it comes to Ukraine.

As consistent rather than selective anti-imperialists, we fully understand that US/NATO military aid to Ukraine is based on the interests of the western powers, not on supporting “democracy against authoritarianism” or other pretenses. The crimes of US imperialism, the dominant global power – in Latin America, in full support of Israel’s war on the Palestinian people and complicity with the most brutal Middle Eastern dictatorships like Egypt and Saudi Arabia, and so much more – continue unabated.

None of this negates Ukraine’s right to receive military aid from anywhere it can. No one in DSA supports the United States government’s foreign policy or its political and economic objectives in Europe or anywhere else in the word. As socialists, we oppose NATO and call for its dissolution. But it happens that at this moment, in the short run, the policy of the US and NATO, for their own reasons, coincides with that of international socialists on the question of arming Ukraine.

While national self-determination is at the center of this discussion, the question of support for democratic movements is also involved. In the past, DSA’s International Committee has muted criticism of some authoritarian regimes, and failed to consistently support democratic movements. We need to have a discussion about the situation today where we don’t have revolutionary regimes, but do have more or less authoritarian and more or less democratic ones, and we need to develop some sophistication about how we develop our analysis.

Ukraine was at the outbreak of the war a very imperfect democracy, but unlike Russia it had some independent labor unions and leftist groups and publications that opposed the Zelensky government. DSA has so far failed to support the Ukrainian people in general, it has declined to support the democratic groups, socialists and left anarchists, unions, and feminists within Ukraine.

In our opinion DSA should be building support for Ukraine’s legitimate war against Russia’s invasion; in demanding both the immediate withdrawal of Russian occupation forces and the cancellation of Ukraine’s crippling and unpayable foreign debt; and supporting and magnifying the voices of progressive and left Ukrainian forces in resisting their own government’s anti-labor and neoliberal policies while actively participating in the war effort.

The socialist tradition demands that we stand with Ukraine and with movements for democracy by the oppressed and the exploited everywhere.

In solidarity:
Traven Leyshon, Central Vermont DSA
Bill Fletcher Jr., At Large DSA
Diane Feeley, Metro Detroit DSA
Dan La Botz, NYC DSA
Phil Gasper, Madison Area DSA
Joanna Misnik, Chicago DSA
Rob Bartlett, Chicago DSA
Claudette Begin, East Bay DSA
Alex Chis, East Bay DSA
Eric Poulos, Lower Manhattan NYC DSA
Stephen R. Shalom, North New Jersey DSA
Stanley Heller, Connecticut DSA

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

summer hard timesFB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC
 

VFA_4

Wang, True Romance – so it seemed

0
warning from da feebs
Sometimes, true love is too good to be true. But here it MUST be true love — just like on TV. FBI graphic.

Online romance scams: Research reveals scammers’
tactics – and how to defend against them

by Fangzhou Wang, University of Texas at Arlington

In the Netflix documentary “The Tinder Swindler,” victims exposed notorious con artist Simon Leviev, who posed as a wealthy diamond mogul on the popular dating app Tinder to deceive and scam numerous women out of millions of dollars. Leviev is a flashy example of a dating scammer, but criminal operations also prey on emotionally vulnerable people to gain their trust and exploit them financially.

The internet has revolutionized dating, and there has been a surge in US adults using apps to find ideal matches post-pandemic. While these apps offer convenience for connecting with romantic partners, they also open the door to online romance scams. Criminals create both deceptive profiles and urgent scenarios to carry out the scam.

The Federal Trade Commission reports that nearly 70,000 Americans fell victim to online romantic scams in 2022, with reported losses topping $1.3 billion.

Online romance scams exploit people through calculated online social engineering and deliberately deceptive communication tactics. In a series of research projects, my colleagues from Georgia State University, University of Alabama, University of South Florida and I focused on understanding how scammers operate, the cues that may prompt changes in their tactics and what measures people can take to defend themselves against falling victim to this scam.


Simon Leviev, the ‘Tinder Swindler,’ conned several women by posing as a diamond mogul.

How online romantic scams work

Online romance scams are not coincidental. They’re carefully planned schemes that follow distinct stages. Research has identified five stages:

  • Baiting victims with attractive profiles.
  • Grooming victims with intimacy.
  • Creating crises to extract money.
  • On occasion manipulating victims with blackmail.
  • Revealing the scam.

In short, scammers do not swindle victims by chance. They plan their actions in advance, patiently following their playbooks to ensure profitable outcomes. Scammers worm their way into a victim’s heart to gain access to their money through false pretenses.

In a previous study, my colleague Volkan Topalli and I analyzed victim testimonials from the website stop-scammers.com. Our research revealed scammers’ use of various social engineering techniques and crisis stories to prompt urgent requests. Scammers leveraged social norms, guilt and supposed emergencies to manipulate victims. Scammers also paid close attention to communication patterns and adapted their tactics based on victims’ responses. This interplay significantly influenced the overall operation of the scam.

Across the globe, online romance scammers use different techniques that vary across cultures to successfully defraud victims. In my recent research, for example, I looked closely into an online romance scam in China called “Sha Zhu Pan,” which loosely translates to “Pig Butchering Scam.” In Sha Zhu Pan, scammers bait and groom victims for financial exploitation through well-structured group setups. Multiple scammers across four groups – hosts, resources, IT and money laundering – persuade victims through romantic tactics to invest in fake apps or use fake gambling websites, convincing them to pay more and more without ever receiving their money back. Hosts interact with victims, resources members identify targets and collect information about them, IT creates the fake apps and websites, and the money launderers process the ill-gotten gains.

Deterrence and rewards

Like street robbers, online romance scammers can be influenced both positively and negatively by a range of situational cues that serve as incentives or deterrents.

Our investigation showed that deterrent messages can significantly affect scammers’ behavior. Here’s an example of a deterrent message: “I know you are scamming innocent people. My friend was recently arrested for the same offense and is facing five years in prison. You should stop before you face the same fate.” Based on live conversations with active scammers online, our recent analysis suggests that receiving deterrent messages reduced scammers’ response rate and their use of certain words, and increased the likelihood that when they sought further communications, they admitted they had done something wrong.

Our observations indicate that scammers not only diversify their approaches to prompt more responses, such as appealing to their romantic relationships, asking for identifying information and requesting victims switch to private chat platforms, but they also use several techniques for getting victims to overcome their misgivings about sending the scammers more money. For example, scammers subtly persuade victims to see themselves as holding more power in the interaction than they do.

Blocking scammers

There are methods that could help users defend against online romance scams.

In experimental findings, my colleagues and I suggest online apps, especially dating apps, implement warning messages. An example would be applying linguistics algorithms to identify keywords like “money,” “MoneyGram” and “bank” in conversations to alert potential victims of the scam and deter scammers from engaging further.

In addition, apps can use tools to detect counterfeit profile pictures and other types of image fraud. By concentrating on identifying scammers’ use of counterfeit profile pictures, this advanced algorithm holds the potential to preemptively hinder scammers from establishing fake profiles and initiating conversations from the outset.


The FBI gives advice on how to protect yourself from romance scams.

How to protect yourself

Online dating app users can take precautions when talking to strangers. There are five rules users should follow to steer clear of scammers:

  1. Avoid sharing financial information with or sending money to strangers.
  2. Refrain from sending private photos to strangers.
  3. Pay attention to spelling and grammar because scammers often claim to reside in English-speaking countries when they actually operate in non-Western countries.
  4. Use image and name-reverse searches.
  5. Confide in family and friends if you grow suspicious.

One last piece of advice to empower those who have fallen victim to online romance scams: Don’t blame yourself.

Take the courageous step of breaking free from the scam and seek support. Reach out to your loved ones, trustworthy third-party organizations and law enforcement agencies for help. This support network is essential in helping you restart your life and move forward.The Conversation

Editor’s note: This is a Copy Commons “wire story” of sorts, from The Conversation. It links to a US Federal Trade Commisson online post about romance fraud statistics, But another publication. Bedbible.com, says that the feds pirated that statistical research from their work at https://bedbible.com/romance-scams-statistics/. Could be.

Fangzhou Wang, Assistant Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Texas at Arlington

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article..com

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

aWOOOOO!FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC
 

VFA_4

¿Wappin? Different Tastes / Gustos Diferentes

0
hooker
The late John Lee Hooker. El difunto John Lee Hooker.
Dibujo por / d
rawing by Mario Perez (Wikimedia).

La lista de reproducción de este viernes
This Friday’s playlist

PsyDub Mix – Alice in DubLand
https://youtu.be/dqQelMDaKjY

Cal Tjader – Solar Heat
https://youtu.be/4JeQdzwcPgc

Sofía Valdés – Handful of Water
https://youtu.be/znN_ZULrX_k

John Lee Hooker, Carlos Santana & Etta James – Fillmore 1986
https://youtu.be/NIemkpnMCvg

Cannons – Hurricane
https://youtu.be/LZ2kSbSrDLs

Karol G – Tiny Desk Concert
https://youtu.be/D8UWsFMVj_Q

Steel Pulse – Soldiers
https://youtu.be/aN7OhTXQT_8

War – City, Country, City
https://youtu.be/DZmeFGmiQDI

Larissa Liveir – Shine On You Crazy Diamond
https://youtu.be/tjjpyUytdsI

1969 Memphis Country Blues Festival – Full Documentary
https://youtu.be/aVhyv-S3R0g

Yoruba Andabo – Abakua
https://youtu.be/Sx_tkrYzSiw

Marianne Faithfull – Witches’ Song
https://youtu.be/H8yJcMuQS1k

Lenny Kravitz – How Long Have You Been Blind?
https://youtu.be/TR5DNlgQJVs

Sech – Esta Noche
https://youtu.be/wJU56kFCdwg

Miss Monique – Siona Records anniversary on Mykonos
https://youtu.be/s-erB7HmdDw

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

abeachdogCIAM

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

$$

 
PDC
 
Dinero2

Panama City mayoral race begins to take shape

0
him
More than half a millennium of bad urban planning: Mayor José Luis Fábrega celebrates the anniversary of Panama City’s Spanish-recognized founding by Pedrarias The Cruel nearly 504 years ago. Actually Panama La Vieja, now a downscale city neighborhood, was the site of an indigenous town noted for the work of its goldsmiths. The Spaniards did their best to erase the memory of the town they turned into the first European settlement on the Pacific Ocean, but a little more than 150 years later a force led by the Welsh privateer Henry Morgan did its best to wipe the original Spanish Panama Ciy off the map. Archive photo by the Panama City municipal government.

The incumbent is probably out, alliance talks continue through the end of September, but these things we know

by Eric Jackson

The PRD, like most of the other established political parties, declined to choose all of their candidates in their parties or conventions, leaving open possibilities to fill them in light of coalition talks with other parties or otherwise. It was a no-brainer that the Democratic Revolutionary Party would not have wanted a mayoral primary in our capital city, whether the intention was just to renominate José Luis “Tanque de Gas” Fábrega Polleri without a primary or to pick someone else. According to various media reports, it is expected that the party will choose somebody else in the process of negotiations with other forces.

Fábrega has been a notorious dud. The worst of it showed early on, an artificial beach just to the west of where the grossly polluted — with smell to match — Matasnillo River empties out in to Panama Bay. It was billed as this selling point to foreign buyers of condos in the area, promising them beachfront properties. Providers of sand to dump on the existing flats had been identified / selected, to the point where the public was assured that the material would come from, around the Perlas Islands.

The failure of such sand replacement schemes at beaches around the world? Shhhhhh. Everybody was also supposed to shut up about the pollution. There were foolish gringos with more money than brains to be conned.

But some wag coined the term “Playa Mojón” — Turd Beach — and even if a majority of the city council went along with the mayor’s scheme neither the public nor the national government did.

Then there was the big idea of a new seafood market to replace the functional enough one that was a gift from Japan some years back. As in, a costly traffic and parking disruption at the western entrance to Santa Ana and the Casco Viejo. To top it off, a proposal for a cable car from there to the top of Ancon Hill. At least they didn’t say “Just like Disney World,” but the proposal was taken as non-serious by just about everybody except for Mayor Fábrega.

So it seems that if the PRD is to take on the daunting task of repeating in the presidency for the first time in a very long time — we might talk about coups d’etat and fraudulent elections, but excepting those, probably since World War II — they figure that to have that slim chance they ned not to be weighed down by Fábrega.

But if an alliance is to give the nomination to another party, that pact is yet to be made, nor are its probable signatories all that obvious. MOLIRENA is allied with the PRD in this cycle, but would that want to hold onto a loser for the next one? It is, after all, an alliance of convenience and patronage sharing rather than of principles.

So figure that Fábrega is out, and if not, then the PRD might be stuck with him as an also-ran.

Whom does that leave? By an old tradition of alternation, that would be the Panameñista, Guillermo “Willie” Bermúdez, the representante from Don Bosco. 

Willie has some money behind him. Billboards by the Pan-American Highway in the Interior, and all that. Gotta appeal to the upscale city residents who drive to their beach or mountain cottages every weekend, after all. The more plebian capitalinos might also see those signs if they are riding the bus, but you might expect them to be less impressed.

What’s not so impressive so far is any list of accomplishments or principled stands to Bermúdez’s credit.

Is there going to be a coalition between the Panameñistas, headed by the former mayor, José Isabel Blandón Figueroa, and Rómulo Roux’s dominant faction of Cambio Democrático? It’s possible, but that pact has yet to be made and its extension down to the local level is also still a hypothetical. Roux has designated legislator Génesis Arjona as the CD mayoral candidate. But she’s an undistinguished faction-hopper and it would be easy to see how that nomination might be negotiated away in some fashion.

2
Is THIS the real race? Current independent legislator Edison Broce, who got ballot status by finishing first in petition signatures but since has been embraced by Ridardo Lombana’s Movimiento Otro Camino (MOCA)?

If this is truly to be a “change” election, it may be The Year of The Independents, headed by 2019’s top independent, Ricardo Alberto Lombana González.

Might part of the women’s vote that traditionally goes Panameñista because women got the right to vote and elected the country’s first female president swing toward MOCA because Lombana is the grand-nephew of Panamanian feminist icon Clara González? On the whole, this generation of Panamanian women are better educated than their male contemporaries and to be expected to be a bit more astute than that, despite the symbolic attractions. In a head-to-head matchup count on the Panama City female electorate to be more demanding and astute than that. It may work to the benefit of Arjona, if she remains as the sole woman among a crowded field of mayoral hopefuls. However, as Election Day approaches look for things to polarize between a couple of leading candidates and for women as well as men to be in a tactical voting mode of thinking.

It’s a long way from now until next May, so expect some twists and turns.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

aWOOOOO!FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC
 

VFA_4

Gilbert & Holmes, Antarctica melts

0
melt
Photo by Konrad Wothe/Image Professionals Gmb/.

Antarctica is missing a chunk of sea ice bigger than Greenland – what’s going on?

by Ella Gilbert, British Antarctic Survey and Caroline Holmes, The Open University

Deadly heatwaves, raging wildfires and record global temperatures are upon us. But far from the flames, at the southernmost tip of the planet, something just as shocking is unfolding.

It’s Antarctic winter, a time when the area of floating sea ice around the continent should be rapidly expanding. This year though, the freeze-up has been happening in slow motion.

After reaching a record low minimum extent this summer there is now an area of open ocean bigger than Greenland. If the “missing” sea ice were a country, it’d be the tenth largest in the world.

graph of Antarctic sea ice extent showing record low 2023 valuesAntarctic sea ice extent in 2023 compared to the 1981-2010 average.  Graphic by Zachary Labe.

Who cares about Antarctic sea ice?

In the face of more immediate climate concerns, why does Antarctic sea ice matter?

Floating sea ice is a pivotal climate puzzle piece. Without it, global temperatures would be warmer because its bright, white surface acts like a mirror, reflecting the sun’s energy back to space. This keeps the Antarctic – and by extension, the planet – cool.

Antarctic sea ice also plays a particularly important role in controlling ocean currents and may act as a buffer that protects floating ice shelves and glaciers from collapsing and adding to global sea levels.

In short, the loss of Antarctic sea ice matters for the whole planet.

Southern sea ice: a short history

Every year Antarctic sea ice undergoes a transformation: from its summer minimum in February, its area increases more than sixfold during the winter freeze-up which reaches its height in September. A clear way to monitor the health of Antarctic sea ice is to track these peaks and troughs.

Records began in 1979 and until 2015, the yearly average extent of frozen sea around Antarctica was increasing ever so slightly. Yet in the past seven years, Antarctic sea ice has changed dramatically.

Floating sea ice near the Antarctic peninsula in December 2017. Photo by Ella Gilbert.

After a record high two years prior, the amount of sea ice fell dramatically at the end of 2016 to a record minimum in February 2017. This was followed by successive low years with the southern hemisphere summer record again being broken in February 2022 and most recently, a new lowest extent of 1.79 million square kilometers being recorded in 2023, a fall of nearly 10% from last year’s summer record.

Since February 2023, slow regrowth has meant sea ice has fallen further and further behind where it should be for the time of year.

And now, in July, what we’re seeing is truly remarkable.

A complex picture

Antarctic sea ice, and how it’s affected by climate change, has been so hard to understand because there are so many factors at play.

Wind patterns, storms, ocean currents and air and ocean temperatures all affect how much of the sea around Antarctica is covered by ice and they often push and pull in different directions. This means it can be hard to link the behavior of Antarctic sea ice in any particular year, or over several years, to just one factor.

This complexity is behind the perplexing increase in Antarctic sea ice extent observed between 1979 and 2015, and what makes it so hard to understand current conditions.

Before 2015, contrasting trends in sea ice growth in different regions of the vast continent mostly counterbalanced each other. What’s remarkable about 2023 is that these regional differences are largely absent.

How rare is it?

This year’s record low summer minimum and record slow freeze-up are astonishing because they fall so far outside the range we have come to expect.

Antarctic sea ice varies a lot year-to-year, but even by Antarctic standards this is well outside the bounds of normality. Some experts have attempted to put a number on just how rare this would be without climate change and arrived at “a once in 7.5-million-year event”.

However, while the current situation is certainly off the charts, those charts don’t go back very far, and so it’s hard to make these sorts of statements with any real certainty.

Given how complex a system it is, we can’t say conclusively whether the past 40 years (the period for which we have satellite observations) are an accurate reflection of the “natural” behaviour of Antarctic sea ice. In fact, there’s good reason to think they aren’t. Which makes it difficult to say exactly how unusual this year’s values are.

However, while we may not be able to put an exact number on it, we know that this is a rare event.

Is it climate change?

Compared with Arctic sea ice, the precipitous decline of which can be robustly linked to rising temperatures, Antarctic sea ice has proved more enigmatic.

In response to greenhouse gas emissions, models have long predicted a drop in Antarctic sea ice: a prediction that previously appeared at odds with the data.

As the ocean and atmosphere warm, we might expect sea ice sandwiched between the two to shrink. But as scientists have come to learn, Antarctic sea ice is more complicated than that.

Models seem unreliable on this topic, which means we still don’t know what Antarctic sea ice decline will look like. And while seven days may be a long time in politics, seven years is a short time when it comes to the climate. It is too early to say conclusively whether the recent dramatic fall in Antarctic sea ice extent is simply a blip in the record or, as now seems more likely, the first sign of a longer-lasting reduction induced by climate change.

What happens in Antarctica doesn’t stay in Antarctica

Regardless of the vagaries of Antarctic sea ice behavior, the polar regions play a vital role in the climate system. And they are changing before our very eyes.

Antarctica isn’t just for the penguins: it matters for all of us.

Ella Gilbert, Climate Scientist, British Antarctic Survey and Caroline Holmes, Polar Climate Scientist, British Antarctic Survey, Associate Lecturer, The Open University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

summer hard timesFB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC
 

VFA_4

Judge lets librarians off the hook

0
A federal judge on Saturday temporarily blocked the implementation of an Arkansas law criminalizing librarians and booksellers who provide access to materials deemed “harmful to minors.” Crime scene: just look at the animalistic expressions on the offenders’ faces. US government photo.

Federal judge blocks Arkansas law criminalizing librarians

by Brett Wilkins — Common Dreams

US District Judge Timothy Brooks—an appointee of former President Barack Obama—issued a preliminary injunction against two sections of Act 372 (also known as S.B. 81), a censorship bill introduced by Arkansas State Senator Dan Sullivan (R-20), passed by the Republican-controlled state Legislature, and signed into law by GOP Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders in March.

The law—which would have gone into effect on Tuesday—makes it a Class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in prison to provide to a minor material “that to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to prurient interest.”

win

The legislation also allows parents and legal guardians to access minors’ library records.

Brooks’ temporary injunction against Act 372 applies to Section 3—which criminalizes librarians and booksellers for providing access to materials deemed “harmful to minors”—and Section 5, which requires libraries to establish material review processes and empowers courts to compel libraries to remove materials that may be protected by the First Amendment.

“If merely having a book accessible on the shelf where a minor can reach it will potentially subject librarians and booksellers to criminal penalties, such books may simply be removed,” Brooks wrote in his 49-page ruling. “As a result, these patrons claim their First Amendment right to access non-obscene (i.e., constitutionally protected) reading material will be dramatically curtailed.”

In May, the Central Arkansas Library System (CALS) led a lawsuit against the legislation. CALS executive director Nate Coulter said he is “extremely pleased and gratified” by Brooks’ ruling.

“I’m relieved that for now the dark cloud that was hanging over CALS’ librarians has lifted—they will not be threatened with jail for making books available to our patrons,” Coulter told the Arkansas Advocate.

ACLU of Arkansas Executive Director Holly Dickson also welcomed the ruling, saying in a statement that “we commend the court’s decision to stop the enforcement of Sections 3 and 5 of Act 372, which would have jeopardized the essential First Amendment rights of all residents of Arkansas.”

“It’s regrettable that we even have to question whether our constitutional rights are still respected today,” Dickson added. “The question we had to ask was, do Arkansans still legally have access to reading materials? Luckily, the judicial system has once again defended our highly valued liberties.”

Earlier this year, the American Library Association said that a record-breaking 2,571 unique titles were challenged by people or groups seeking bans in 2022, a 38% increase from the previous year.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

summer hard timesFB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC
 

VFA_4

Editorials: An overcrowded presidential field; and Tuberville’s stupid game

0
TE
A cropped graphic by the Tribunal Electoral.

…and now there are 10

It will probably be fewer by the end of September when coalition talks have run their course, and may be yet again adjusted in the likely event that before the end of the year appeals courts uphold Ricardo Martinelli’s criminal conviction.

A ten-way race, or one with six or seven tickets, is not a good way to choose the government of a strong presidential system, especially if more than two of the tickets have support in the double digits.

(In a parliamentary system the math works differently, but we can look at Spain’s current quandary and see what mischief political and social fragmentation can do.)

Our current constitution, promulgated by a dictatorship that ended decades ago, had as its basis a political patronage deal. Government by division of the spoils has become ever creepier since the brass hats left the seats of power. The system and its constitution need to be replaced.

One of the reasons why Panama’s system of government needs to change is that someone whom the great majority of Panamanians have good reason to despise may grab the reins of power with only a third or even a quarter of the vote.

A multi-party system in which the parties stand for things would be a different matter, but here small parties are just businesses angling for jobs and government contracts for their members. We don’t get serious debate about serious ideas that way.

When it all falls apart, or if we have a constitutional convention to avoid it all falling apart, Panama should institute a runoff presidential election when no contender gets a majority of the vote. It’s better to have candidates who run to unite than those who play on divisions. The need to muster a majority would be a stride toward national unity that allows different sorts of people to work for common goals.

and Tommy doesn't know what day it is
Left to right, US Senator Tommy Tuberville, US Ambassador Mari Carme Aponte, US Representative Jerry Carl. Photo from Tuberville’s congressional website.

To be secure…

Tommy Tuberville, the football coach turned senator, is blocking appointments to senior military officers. He says he’s doing it because he’s against abortions and he’s against queers and he intends to carry out those policies by not only forcing them on the men and women in the US Armed Forces, but on their spouses and children as well.

He came to Panama last March, looking to counter the “economic risks of China’s growing influence in the global trade market” and to “combat drug and human trafficking in the region.”

Would ever Tuberville acknowledge that Panama has a say in Panamanian trade relations with China? Would he admit that Colombia’s Clan del Golfo is an offshoot of the old UUC death squads with which US-funded Colombian government forces were de facto allied as part of Plan Colombia?

All a game to him, but by disrupting the US military command structure as a political gesture, he may allow the other teams to score on America, a tally not kept in numbers on a scoreboard but in human lives.

 

Bert. It's Ernie that's evil.
Wikimedia photo by Anefo.

The people who are regarded as moral luminaries are those who forego ordinary pleasures themselves and find compensation in interfering with the pleasures of others.

Bertrand Russell

Bear in mind…

               A lie runs until it is overtaken by the truth.

Cuban Proverb               

               Justice cannot be for one side alone, but must be for both.

Eleanor Roosevelt               

               Sweet is war to those who know it not.

Pindar                  

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

summer hard timesFB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC
 

VFA_4

Google cashes in on YouTube climate disinformation

0
Lyft / Bolsonaro / Google
“It’s time for YouTube to step up, detox its platform, and protect the integrity of the fight against the climate crisis,” said Ekō’s campaign director. As Ekō researchers documented, an advertisement for Lyft appeared next to a disinformation video on YouTube claiming NGOs started fires in the Amazon rainforest. Composite graphic by Ekō.

Google-owned YouTube makes millions from channels pushing climate disinformation – analysis

by Jessica Corbett – Common Dreams

Google-owned YouTube is again facing allegations of profiting from not enforcing its own ban on the monetization of climate misinformation, this time in a report published Friday amid legislative battles in Brazil over policies on the Amazon rainforest, Indigenous rights, and social media.

Google announced in October 2021 that for advertisers and publishers along with creators on its video platform YouTube, the company would “prohibit ads for, and monetization of, content that contradicts well-established scientific consensus around the existence and causes of climate change.”

For four weeks, researchers with Ekō—a group formerly known as SumOfUs that works to curb the power of big corporations—reviewed 60 YouTube videos in English and Portuguese that contained disinformation and conspiracy theories about Amazon deforestation, Indigenous rights, and the climate emergency.

Over two-thirds of the videos were monetized, and Ekō identified more than 150 brands in the ads. Using a common industry tool, researchers estimated that the channels—which collectively had over 40 million subscribers and more than 5 million views—earn $636,000 to $10.1 million a year through monetization.

“The proliferation of disinformation and conspiracy theories are helping to derail efforts by the Lula administration to advance policy agendas around Amazon protection, Indigenous land rights, and social media regulation.”

“Ekō researchers found top-name apparel, electronics, and drink brands appearing next to videos suggesting actor Leonardo DiCaprio funded nongovernmental organizations to commit arson in the Amazon,” the publication continues. “Other false claims include that the rainforest is too humid to catch fire, and that manmade global warming is a lie.”

“The proliferation of disinformation and conspiracy theories are helping to derail efforts by the Lula administration to advance policy agendas around Amazon protection, Indigenous land rights, and social media regulation,” the document adds, pushing for policy “that prevents platforms from monetizing and profiting from disinformation and lies that are subverting the legislative process.”

In a statement Friday, Ekō campaign director Vicky Wyatt also demanded action from the company.

“While global warming, deforestation, and wildfires reach their highest levels ever recorded, YouTube’s shameless greenwashing is exposed—with the company giving profits to climate deniers to the tune of millions,” said Wyatt. “This is a clear slap in the face to the brands whose advertisements unknowingly support climate disinformation. It’s time for YouTube to step up, detox its platform, and protect the integrity of the fight against the climate crisis.”

Ekō’s analysis follows a May report from Climate Action Against Disinformation (CAAD) for which researchers found 200 YouTube videos containing climate mis- and disinformation. The videos had a total of 73.8 million views and all had featured ads.

YouTube spokesperson Michael Aciman toldEngadget in response to those findings that the company is “constantly working” to remove content that violates its rules and welcomes third-party feedback to “help improve the accuracy of our enforcement over time.”

“In 2021, we launched a new, industry-leading policy that explicitly prohibits ads from running on content promoting false claims about the existence and causes of climate change, which we designed in consultation with experts and authoritative sources on climate science,” Aciman also said. “We do allow policy debate or discussions of climate-related initiatives, but when content crosses the line to climate change denial, we remove ads from serving on those videos.”

Meanwhile, Callum Hood, head of research at the Center for Countering Digital Hate, part of the CAAD coalition, said at the time that “despite Google’s green grandstanding, its ads continue to fuel the climate denial industry.”

“Whether it’s taking cash to target users with climate disinformation, or running ads that make climate denial content profitable, the company is selling out,” Hood added. “Tech companies make big promises on hate and misinformation because they know it’s hard to see if they’ve kept them. We need to force Google to open up the black box of its advertising business.”

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

summer hard timesFB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC
 

VFA_4