Home Blog Page 82

House GOP in disarray. Dems in array, for a change.

0
Kevin Mc
The first round of voting for House speaker showed the ramifications of “the rise of the extreme MAGA caucus,” said one Democrat. Trump aide Matt Lira speaks with Kevin McCarthy during the 2019 Presidential Social Media Summit at the White House. White House photo by Andrea Hanks.

McCarthy fails to win House speakership in second round vote

by Julia Conley & Jessica Corbett — Common Dreams

With several far-right allies of former President Donald Trump leading a charge to block US House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy’s bid to become speaker of the chamber, the California Republican repeatedly fell short of the votes he needed to prevail on Tuesday.

During both rounds of voting, McCarthy got only 203 votes from his fellow Republicans, several short of the 218 votes needed to win the leadership position. In the second round of voting, GOP Rep. Jim Jordan (OH) received 19 votes.

That came after Jordan secured just six votes in the first round, when 10 Republicans supported Rep. Andy Biggs (AZ) while Reps. Byron Donalds (FL) and Jim Banks (IN) as well as former Rep. Lee Zeldin (NY) each received one vote.

Defectors included outspoken backers of Trump—who urged members to support McCarthy—including Republican Reps. Matt Gaetz of Florida and Lauren Boebert of Colorado.

For both rounds, every Democrat backed Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), who ended up with more votes than McCarthy but did not win the majority needed for the speakership. Jeffries is expected to become the House minority leader.

Leading up to the first vote, McCarthy agreed to some demands by his detractors, who include members of the House Freedom Caucus. He agreed to include in the House rules a stipulation that members can vote to unseat the speaker at any time, but refused to pledge to hold votes on some bills proposed by ultra-conservative members. He also did not pledge that the party’s political action committee would decline to fund primary challengers.

No other members can be sworn in until the speaker is elected, and the House will not be able to proceed with any official business until the matter is resolved.

The second round of voting began shortly after McCarthy lost the first round, with Jordan once again giving a nominating speech in support of the California lawmaker.

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) tweeted that McCarthy’s failure to win the leadership post shows “the rise of the extreme MAGA caucus [has] already had ramifications.”

“House Republicans are showing the American people that they can’t govern,” said Lieu.

Anticipating the revolt by some House Republicans, The Washington Post noted last week that “the last time a speaker election took more than one ballot was in 1923, when Speaker Frederick Gillett (R-MA) was reelected on the ninth ballot.”

 

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

Editorials: Nito’s report; and Trump’s unfolding downfall

0
Nito's report
“I would like to emphasize that these 200 public infrastructure works that I have just mentioned, which, I repeat, are not all of them, generate jobs, move the national and local economy, contributing directly to the country’s economic recovery.” President Laurentino Cortizo Cohen makes his report to the nation at the opening session of the 2023 legislative year. Photo by the Presidencia.

A detailed report, short on inspiration

President Cortizo addressed the National Assembly and the Panamanian people as scheduled, as the 2023 legislative session opened. Given all the cynicism and scurrilous personal attacks that are now the coin of the realm in discourse about public affairs, plus given that so many people are suffering and have been since even before the COVID virus hit us, he did well enough to spend nearly two hours explaining what he has been doing, what he has been trying to do and more or less where the money went. If he didn’t soothe, he well enough explained.

The presidential website didn’t promptly post his entire speech, as has been the practice in years past. Neither on video replay, nor the written text, let alone an English translation nor one in any of the indigenous or other minority languages. We got little video snippets and memes on Nito’s Twitter feed instead.

There were and are other sources, and perhaps the Presidencia will link to them, or post more definitive ones. Let’s not get into an argument among Panamanians about style.

On the other hand, what Cortizo did not do was inspire.

That he addressed a weary and divided nation, many of whose citizens are in surly moods, ought to be inspiring enough after his ordeals of the past year. It’s still not enough.

In difficult economic times when the nation really can’t afford it, can we get past the transactional politics of political patronage? Maybe Nito Cortizo can, but purchased support is a basic premise of his own party, and of all the other parties that have held the presidency since the invasion, as well as the long-standing minor parties angling for spots in a coalition that bring their members jobs and government contracts.

It’s a moral inspiration that Panama needs, maybe with overtones of a religious one. The president shows signs of probity by what he vetoes or disapproves. Yet in the moments that he reports, lectures or discusses he doesn’t rally the nation around any sorto moral revival, nor does he thunder indignation against the games that politicians – including those of his own party – are playing. Nor against the culture of juega vivo that has seeped into all levels of society. He does his job and explains what he did, but in a deeper sense neither Nito Cortizo nor anybody else is really leading the nation.

 

 

q
There will come a day when almost nobody will admit to having fallen for this weirdness. But the primitive hatreds and militant ignorance from whence it came will still be threads in the US social fabric. Wikimedia graphic by RootOfAllLight.

Now that the handwriting
is on the wall for Trump

The game is up, but the order of the end game is not yet set. Republicans who were groveling sycophants a short while ago are heading toward the exits.

Donald Trump might be charged in Georgia with urging that state’s top election official to falsify the 2020 presidential vote in that state. In New York all manner of state tax frauds and business frauds are under investigation, and his main company has been found guilty of tax fraud. Federal investigations in New York were paused but show signs of revival, pertaining to bank fraud, bankruptcy fraud and other crimes. The illegal retention of public records, including some highly classified documents, is an open-and-shut case whenever the feds care to bring it, but there are some questions about serious aggravation – did he give or sell classified information to foreign potentates, or intend to do so? Then there is the matter of trying to corruptly overthrow the result of the 2020 election, with a couple of the major angles being the incitement, perhaps planning, of the Capitol riot; and the attempt to submit fraudulent sets of electors to Congress.

However, now that Mr. Trump’s tax returns are in public circulation, perhaps the Al Capone route is the way to go. He defrauded the tax collectors in a big way.

Perhaps, though, wire and mail fraud with respect to specific individuals rather than institutions that have been widely vilified for many years is the more politically astute case to bring. Or, as the man has been into so many frauds for so many years, it could easily be a federal racketeering case.

So will prosecutors and jurisdictions battle one another for who gets the first bite?

The best-developed, easiest to understand, most depraved case in a jurisdiction with minimal possibility of jury nullification probably ought to have priority. If justice is done the guy will be on trial for the rest of his life, already doing time on some charges and fighting yet others. As in, he will not the GOP nominee in 2024 nor in any other year.

Still, the wells of hatred, cruelty and snobbery that Trump tapped are still there and other Republicans are drawing on those wells. Just who and what Americans really are, deep down inside, is a matter to be fought out for years to come.

 

 

z
Zora Neale Hurston in 1938. Library of Congress
archive photo by Carl Van Vechten.

It seems to me that trying to live without friends is like milking a bear to get cream for your morning coffee. It is a whole lot of trouble, and then not worth much after you get it.

Zora Neale Hurston

Bear in mind…

At the end of the day, we can endure much more than we think we can.

Frida Kahlo

Not all those who wander are lost.

J.R.R. Tolkien

Endure, and keep yourselves for days of happiness.

Virgil

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

A “to do” list at the editor’s “other job”

0
star apple flowers
Panama has a dry season — called “verano” in Panamanian Spanish — and a rainy season that encompasses most of the year, heavier toward its end. However, we don’t have a fall, in which most of the trees shed their leaves and after which the harvest of food crops pauses for some months. These little pink flowers, for example, indicate a dry season with “star apples” (in Zonian English, a/k/a carambolas, star fruit or fruta china) to pick.

When reporting, research and writing don’t pay much…

by Eric Jackson

…then in today’s economy many a journalist without a corporate boss will need a second job of sorts. For the guy who produces and edits The Panama News, that gig is as a Third World peasant on a 900-square-meter farm.

It’s out front and in the back, lazily and haphazardly, with as few chemicals and as little soil tilling as possible, letting grass and other clippings lie where they fall and compost back into the soil. Is it “organic permaculture?” It’s informed by that, anyway.

Out back

2
Those star apples keep coming for most of the year. Were the tree to be managed like on a cash crop farm, the fruit would be bagged to reduce insect and bird damage. But the increased fruit drop from those things? Either leave them where they fall or toss them in a spot where the soil could use a bit more compost. This is a lazy old hippie’s “second job.” And the fruit that does get picked? Mostly to eat, some to put up in canning jars and — especially not quite ripe pieces — some to be cut up to brew with tea for that extra fruity flavor.

 

3
A banana stem — not really a TREE — starts to lean over under the weight of flowers and fruit. Commercial farm efficiency might demand that the flower and that part of the plant between it and the ripening bananas be cut. Just waiting for the stem to fall over will suffice. What to do with the fallen stem becomes a matter for decisions and labor. Protecting the bananas from predation by bats as they fully ripen becomes an important little task. How many of the bananas will be coated in chocolate and tossed in the freezer? We shall see.

 

4
This mango tree is in the way because it threatens star apple and citrus trees that the editor finds more valuable. Not all in one chopping, the tree and its roots will be removed. These branches need to be cut some more. The wood may then LOOK haphazardly stacked but it will be placed to decompose into the soil and also to make the fence less attractive for kids to climb over in a few certain spots.

 

5
Does this sickly hibiscus shrub have a new life ahead of it? Leave it as is and it’s likely to die. Cut it way back, and stack wood from the mango tree and other organic detritus around it and it may eventually grow back, healthy and beautiful and adding to the farm’s privacy and security. That’s the bet, anyway.

 

6
The product of agricultural indolence: just tossing aside bits of yuca root or stems that were inconvenient to peel and cook for dinner — or in dire circumstances to feed the dogs, and give it a few months and these start to put down roots. These stems need to be cut down and stuck in the ground to grow. There are more of them than the editor can use. Want some yuca — or chaya — to plant? Under contemplation is a giveaway in exchange for whatever folks want to donate to The Panama News.

 

7
The 2022 lemon harvest isn’t ENTIRELY over just yet.

 

food dryer
This food dryer will be used not only for things grown on this farm, nor just for things to eat.

 

Guarumo, a variety of cecropia, grows on the property and might be boiled fresh or dried to be boiled later to make a medicinal tea. There are many claims made about it, some medically tested and verified. In general its anti-inflammatory properties are most often the reasons it is used.

In front

The front porch has planter boxes that are mostly shaded by some palm trees out front, a flat little side yard with bananas, chaya and sunflowers, and a larger, sloping side yard with bamboo stands of two species, a dwarf coconut tree that’s producing after many years, and various other plants. Some of the planting on that side is to produce food, but a lot of it is to prevent erosion.

 

The Mexican oregano (Lippia graveolens) is now flowering in one of the planter boxes. Time to harvest and dry leaves and cut it back to grow another year’s crop instead of the plant dying. In the wake of a June 2021 attack on my home and person by five maleantes there was this prosecutor trying various devices to make that case that I was the criminal who needed to be removed. A cop was sent to inspect my garden. Alas, no ganja weed, no coca bushes, no opium poppies, no magic mushrooms. I welcomed him in and showed him around, and when I said Mexican oregano he pointed out that it isn’t true oregano but a species of verbena, and that the Cuban oregano that I grow near the front fence is a species of coleus rather than true oregano. A gardener, he seemed to be, and one who explained to his colleagues that they were dealing with this odd old Zonian, not some drug lord. Or did he just say that to keep me off my guard?

 

death to the fascist insects
In the front corner of the smaller side yard, street construction has altered the leaf cutter ant habitat. That area has been a problem anyway, due to neighbors who cut and burn the vegetation on their property and also from time to time have someone spray herbicides on it. It makes for ant-friendly soil. Ants have no respect for lot lines or fences, will strip my garden to fertilize theirs, and this normally organic old hippie has such disrespect for these actually amazing underground fungus farmer insects that one scheduled task is chemical warfare. Death to the fascist insects!

 

Popeye the hippie gardener?
We get to the end of a year’s spinach crop. I’m tossing the ripe seeds across the fence among and in front of the palms that give me some shade and privacy. The hope is for spinach growing as a weed there. Just in case, I will make a few cuttings and put them in bottles of water to root.

 

little bamboo
Some of the “little bamboo,” an unwanted weed in this spot but a vital home defense a few feet behind. The lady who owned this property before me is an artist, and environmentally wise. Got a distorted notion of football players and their college majors? Underwater basket weaving isn’t done with scuba gear, but with a sink. As in the bamboo is cut, the leaves are stripped away, and the grass is allowed to dry. Then worked in a tub full of water as wet, flexible material to be woven, and when the weaving is done, taken out and allowed to dry and harden. The football star who’s really good at this will have a lifetime in the arts to look forward to after playing days are over. But this bamboo species was planted on one side of the house as a privacy hedge and on the other for erosion control — to keep the house from sliding down the hill. The stuff spreads to where it’s not wanted, and on the one side there’s surely some to harvest if there is an interested underwater basket weaver who wants it. As in, machete work.

 

The blight that has killed so many cashew trees is killing mine, so this is axe work exercise to come.
 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

Old Year’s trashy cultural baggage

0
board of bustees
Suspects who allegedly disturbed such New Year’s Eve peace as there was at the Abrook Mall. Photo by the Policia Nacional.

Worst behavior for New Year’s

by Eric Jackson

What WAS the big ruckus at the Albrook Mall?

The first things to hit Twitter said a shootout between rival gangs. Later the police said that no shots were fired, that there was some sort of ruckus between two groups and that people went running, provoking some panic among others, when the badges appeared.

Seven adults and three minors were arrested, exactly for what is unclear but it was not about gunplay. One of the worst things about Panamanian culture is this tendency to copy the worst things about US culture. But no mall shooting on the last day of 2022. We aren’t THAT MUCH like Gringolandia, and the police and most politicians are fairly adamant that we don’t adopt northern practices of gun worship and acquisition of private arsenals here.

However, what WAS this? By one version, employees of two neighboring stores at the mall, said to have a long-running dispute? According to a preliminary official account, two rival groups. Or was it one gang pretending to be two, so as to cause panic and confusion as a cover for something else? Might we only know when stores in the affected parts of the mall take inventory and find things missing? This reporter wasn’t there, and doesn’t know. Neither did those who, via the Internet, first broke the news of some sort of disturbance – which they called a shootout – at the Albrook Mall. Take what the police say with however many grains of salt you must, but understand that they had no obvious reason to lie about it.

~ ~

But WAIT! What’s that other disturbance in the national bus terminal that’s adjacent to the mall, on the upper platform where buses come in from the other side and from the Interior?

Just a rowdy argument between a rider and a pavo, so it seems. Over what? Who knows? At least nobody got knocked or pushed over the rail. That could be deadly.

No harm, no foul? At least not enough harm to bring in the riot squad.

~ ~

As the turn of the clock that marked start of the next year’s calendar approached, the annual barrage began. Cats and horses sought places to cower. Dogs whimpered and howled in pain – the explosions literally make their sensitive ears hurt.

The worst of it was people – usually adolescent boys – aiming their rockets or throwing their firecrackers of various descriptions, power and loudness at animals. It’s a form of animal abuse within the penal law’s definition, but the National Police aren’t about to send officers out to catch people doing that.

~ ~

The cops after dark on the night of the 31st and the morning of the 1st? Busy with other things, serious things in their own right. Like drunk drivers, or people who don’t even need to take a drink to turn themselves into deadly hazards behind their drivers’ wheels.

~ ~

Might shrinks, criminologists, priests, judges or sociologists be able to tell us why? And does the cause much matter? A lot of people behave badly on the last day of the year. If there are things about Panamanian culture about which we should be justifiably proud, this isn’t one of them.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

Gush Shalom, The UN’s referral of the Occupation to the World Court

0
Shireen
The funeral procession in Ramallah for Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, who was shot and killed by an Israeli soldier while reporting in Jenin. The Israeli government kept changing its story about her death. There has been no accountability. Israeli police attacked her funeral, beating pallbearers before they withdrew in the face of this huge crowd of mourners. Palestine Information Center photo.

The UN decision is a necessary message to Israel’s extreme right-wing government

by Gush Shalom

Gush Shalom, the Israeli Peace Bloc wrote tonight to the United Nations Secretary-General, welcoming the General Assembly’s decision to refer to the review of the International Court the issue of Israel’s occupation rule over millions of Palestinians. This conveys a correct and message to the extreme right-wing government that has emerged in Israel. Let this government know that the International Community is not indifferent to wrongdoings committed by the State of Israel.

Since 1967, and for 55 years already, the State of Israel maintains a brutal military rule over millions of Palestinian residents and imposes its rule on them against their will. For fifty-five years, successive Israeli governments asserted that this is a “temporary” situation, pending negotiations at some misty future date. But this argument sounds more and more hollow and empty – especially when the government that has now been installed in Israel intends to act with all its might to perpetuate Israeli rule in these territories and increase and expand the construction of settlements.

As Israeli citizens anxious for the future of our country, we in Gush Shalom wholeheartedly welcome the decision of the Assembly General and the comprehensive judicial review that will take place at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. One can wish and hope that this process will force the State of Israel to take at last the decision it has been trying to avoid for so many years.

If these territories are “our country” as Prime Minister Netanyahu claims, and if the State of Israel is a democratic country, then Israel should grant its citizenship to all residents living in “our country” and allow them to participate in the elections which determine the government that rules over them – and then there will be a completely different government in Israel. If the State of Israel does not want this, it must withdraw its army from these territories and allow the Palestinians to establish their independent state there.

And should the State of Israel refuse to grant citizenship to the Palestinians and also insist on maintaining military rule over them and shooting to death young Palestinians who oppose this rule, Israel will no longer be able to claim that it is “the only democracy in the Middle East”. Rather, Israel will become heir to the former Apartheid regime in South Africa, where the right to vote was limited to whites and denied to blacks.

We strongly uphold the judges of the International Court of Justice, who will now deal in depth with the issues that the judges of the Supreme Court in Jerusalem avoid.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

Schmalz, Pope Benedict XVI remembered

0
W and a former Hitler Youth
Pope Benedict XVI with George W. Bush and members of the latter’s family at Andrews Air Force Base. White House photo.

A man at odds with the modern world who leaves
a legacy of intellectual brilliance and controversy

by Mathew Schmalz, College of the Holy Cross

Benedict XVI leaves behind a complex legacy as a Pope and theologian.

To many observers, Benedict, who died on Dec. 31, 2022 at the age of 95, was known for criticizing what he saw as the modern world’s rejection of God and Christianity’s timeless truths. But as a scholar of the diversity of global Catholicism, I think it’s best to avoid simple characterizations of Benedict’s theology, which I believe will influence the Catholic Church for generations.

While the brilliance of this intellectual legacy will certainly endure, it will also have to contend with the shadows of the numerous controversies that marked Benedict’s time as pope and, later, as pope emeritus.

Priest and professor

Benedict was born Josef Alois Ratzinger on April 16, 1927, in Marktl am Inn, Germany. During World War II, he was required to join the Hitler Youth, a wing of the Nazi Party. He was later drafted into an anti-aircraft unit and then the infantry of Nazi Germany.

A young man dressed in priest robes waving to a group of parishioners.Josef Ratzinger taking office as Bishop of Munich in 1977. Photo by Claus Hampel/ullstein bild via Getty Images

In 1945, he deserted the German military and was held as a prisoner of war by the Americans; he was released when World War II concluded. In 1946, he went to study for the priesthood and was ordained five years later. He completed his doctorate in theology in 1953.

While teaching at the University of Bonn, Ratzinger was chosen as a theological adviser to Cardinal Joseph Frings of Cologne, a strong critic of Nazism, for the Second Vatican Council held between 1962 and 1965. The Second Vatican Council attempted to renew the Catholic Church by engaging the modern world more constructively. At the council, Ratzinger argued that Catholic theology needed to develop a “new language” to speak to a changing world.

As pope, Benedict would later reject more progressive interpretations of the council as a revolutionary event that was intended to remake the Catholic Church. While the council did bring substantial changes to Catholic life, particularly by allowing mass in local languages, Benedict resisted any suggestion that the Second Vatican Council was calling for a fundamental break with centuries-old Catholic doctrine and tradition. And during his pontificate, he would permit wider celebration of the old Latin Mass – a decision that his successor Pope Francis would later reverse

In 1966, Ratzinger accepted an important teaching position at the University of Tubingen. During the late 1960s, Tubingen saw widespread student protests, some of which called for the Catholic Church to become more democratic. When protesting students disrupted the Tubingen faculty senate, Ratzinger reportedly walked out instead of speaking with students as other faculty did. Ratzinger was disturbed by what he felt were dictatorial and Marxist tendencies among the student protesters. Ratzinger then moved to the University of Regensberg.

In 1977, he was named bishop of Munich and Freising by Pope Paul VI. Soon after, he was named a cardinal, a member of the administrative body that elects the pope.

Cardinal and pope

As a skilled theologian, Ratzinger was chosen by Pope John Paul II to head the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which oversees and enforces Catholic doctrine. In this position, Cardinal Ratzinger disciplined a number of theologians. Most notable was the case of American priest and theologian Charles Curran, who was fired from The Catholic University of America because he challenged official Catholic teachings on sexuality.

Ratzinger was also chosen to head the committee drafting The Catechism of the Catholic Church. Published in 1992, The Catechism remains an important foundation for any understanding of Catholic thought and practice.

After John Paul II’s death in 2005, Ratzinger was elected pope. He chose the name “Benedict” in honor of Benedict of Nursia, the founder of Western monasticism, a religious movement that preserved Western culture after the fall of Rome. The name “Benedict” also acknowledged Benedict XV, a much-overlooked pope who tried to broker a peace agreement to end the First World War.

Controversies in the pontificate

After his election, Pope Benedict XVI had to confront a growing sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic Church. While a cardinal, he had publicly downplayed the extent and seriousness of the crisis. And it was under his leadership that The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith decided not to remove Lawrence C. Murphy from the priesthood, even though Murphy had been accused of molesting more than 200 boys at a Catholic school for the deaf in Wisconsin.

As pope, however, Benedict did take some strong steps that his predecessor, John Paul II, did not. Most significantly, Benedict punished Marcial Maciel Degollado, an incestuous bigamist, serial pedophile and the powerful founder of the Legionaries of Christ, an important Catholic religious order, by taking away his permission to preach or to say Mass publicly. He also criticized Irish bishops for their mishandling of the sexual abuse crisis.

For many survivors of clerical sexual abuse, these actions were not nearly enough. Benedict did not move to open Vatican records to public investigation, and he also failed to discipline cardinals and bishops who reassigned pedophile priests.

Beyond the sexual abuse crisis, Benedict’s pontificate had other controversies that drew worldwide attention. During a lecture in Regensberg in 2006, Benedict seemed to criticize the Islamic view of God and the legacy of the Prophet Muhammad. This lecture led to protests in the Middle East and South Asia. However, his official visits to Beirut and Istanbul repaired some of the damage.

Benedict also reached out to Catholic splinter groups. In 2009, he lifted the excommunication of bishops of the order of St. Pius X, a breakaway Catholic sect that rejects the reforms of the Second Vatican Council. After doing this, Benedict learned that one St. Pius X bishop, Richard Williamson, had made antisemitic comments and denied the holocaust.

Benedict said his lack of knowledge about Williamson’s views was an “unforeseen mishap” due to a lack of familiarity with the internet as a “source of information.”

Theological writings

As pope, Benedict continued his theological writing and produced three important encyclicals or papal letters.

The first encyclical, Deus Caritas Est, or “God is Love,” defends “charity” as love that is freely given. Charity is not simply a good deed but an act that changes both the giver and the recipient.

The second encyclical, Spe Salvi, or “Saved in Hope,” reflects upon the hope that God gives human beings in a world that often seems hopeless.

In the third encyclical, Caritas in Veritate, or “Charity in Truth,” Benedict argues that charity is fundamentally related to justice. And when it comes to questions of human progress and fulfillment, we cannot place our trust in the nation state or market economies because “without God, man neither knows which way to go, nor even understands who he is.”

These papal letters attempt to defend Christianity in a world that Benedict believed was growing increasingly hostile to religious faith. What was striking about Benedict’s thought – even to his theological critics – was how elegantly he presented his case for Christ and Christianity’s transforming power as sources of truth, beauty and love. But long before he became pope, Benedict admitted that Christianity would continue to lose cultural ground and dwindle to an ever smaller group of faithful believers. Writing in 1969, Ratzinger predicted the Church would have “to start afresh from the very beginning,” which meant that someday Christianity would have to build itself up again from its foundations.

The legacy of Benedict XVI

Pope Benedict XVI dressed in white robes raises both hands to greet peoplePope Benedict XVI during a general audience held at the Vatican in 2013. AP Photo/Andrew Medichini.

When Benedict resigned as pope in 2013, it took the world by surprise. In saying that he could no longer bear the burdens of the Papacy, Benedict promised to live in seclusion. His official title became “Pope Emeritus.”

But controversy also followed his resignation. For example, he gave interviews and put his name on writings that appeared to criticize the reforms of Pope Francis, who succeeded him.

Most recently, a January 2022 report on sexual abuse in the diocese of Munich criticized Ratzinger’s “inaction” regarding four cases of sexual abuse during his period as archbishop from 1977 to 1982. In reaction to the report, the pope emeritus apologized but did not admit to any administrative failures.

Benedict XVI’s writings will be relevant decades from now, but his pontificate will inevitably be associated with controversies. As for his own personal legacy, that will likely be defined by the one issue that concerned Benedict the most: how the Catholic Church can still make a difference in the modern world.The Conversation

Mathew Schmalz, Professor of Religious Studies, College of the Holy Cross

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

Sachs, Talking peace in Ukraine

0
war
The Ukraine War is an extremely dangerous war between nuclear superpowers in a world desperately in need of peace and cooperation. Kherson in the aftermath of Russia’s Christmas Eve shelling. Wikimedia photo by the Kherson Regional State Administration.

A mediator’s guide to peace in Ukraine

by Jeffrey D. Sachs — Common Dreams

There is a new glimmer of hope for a quick negotiated end to the war in Ukraine.

In his recent press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron, President Joe Biden stated, “I’m prepared to speak with Mr. Putin if in fact, there is an interest in him deciding he’s looking for a way to end the war. He hasn’t done that yet. If that’s the case, in consultation with my French and my NATO friends, I’ll be happy to sit down with Putin to see what he wants, has in mind.” President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman replied that Russia is ready for negotiations aimed “to ensure our interests.”

Now is the time for mediation, based on the core interests and bargaining space of the three main parties to the conflict: Russia, Ukraine, and the United States.

The war is devastating Ukraine. According to EU President Ursula von der Leyen, Ukraine has already lost 100,000 soldiers and 20,000 civilians. Not only Ukraine but also Russia, the United States, and the European Union — indeed the entire world — stand to benefit enormously from an end to the conflict, lifting both the nuclear dread that hangs over the world today and the devastating economic fallout of the war.

No less an authority than the Chairman of the US Joints Chiefs of Staff, General Mark A. Milley, has urged a negotiated political solution to the conflict, noting that Ukraine’s chance for a military victory, is “not high.”

There are four core issues to negotiate: Ukraine’s sovereignty and security; the fraught issue of NATO enlargement; the fate of Crimea; and the future of the Donbas.

Ukraine demands above all to be a sovereign country, free from Russia’s domination, and with secure borders. There are some in Russia, perhaps including Putin himself, who believe that Ukraine is really part of Russia. There will be no negotiated peace without Russia recognizing Ukraine’s sovereignty and national security backed by explicit international guarantees of the UN Security Council and nations including Germany, India, and Turkiye.

Russia demands above all that NATO renounce its intention to expand to Ukraine and Georgia, which would fully encircle Russia in the Black Sea (adding Ukraine and Georgia to existing Black Sea NATO members Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey). NATO refers to itself as a defensive alliance, yet Russia believes differently, knowing full well of the US penchant for regime-change operations against governments it opposes (including Ukraine in 2014, with the US role in the overthrow of then pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych).

Russia also claims Crimea as home to Russia’s Black Sea Fleet since 1783. Putin warned George Bush Jr. in 2008 that if the United States pushed NATO into Ukraine, Russia would re-take Crimea, which Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev had transferred from Russia to Ukraine in 1954. Until Yanukovich’s overthrow, the Crimea question was handled prudently by Russia-Ukrainian agreements that gave Russia a long-term lease on its naval facilities in Sevastopol, Crimea.

Ukraine and Russia differ heatedly over the Donbas, with its predominantly ethnic Russian population. While the Ukrainian language and cultural identity prevails in most of Ukraine, Russian cultural identity and language prevail in the Donbas. After Yanukovych’s overthrow, the Donbas became a battleground between pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian paramilitaries, with the pro-Russian forces declaring the independence of the Donbas.

The Minsk II agreement of 2015 was a diplomatic agreement to end the fighting, based on autonomy (self-government) for the Donbas region within Ukrainian borders, and respect for the Russian language and culture. After signing, Ukrainian leaders made clear that they resented the agreement and would not honor it. Though France and Germany were guarantors of the agreement, they did not press Ukraine to follow through. From Russia’s point of view, Ukraine and the West thereby repudiated a diplomatic solution to the conflict.

In late 2021, Putin reiterated Russia’s demand for no further enlargement of NATO, especially to Ukraine. The United States refused to negotiate over NATO enlargement. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg provocatively stated at the time that Russia would have no say in the matter, and that only NATO members would decide whether or not to encircle Russia in the Black Sea.

In March 2022, a month after the Russian invasion, Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky made substantial progress on a pragmatic negotiated end to the war, based on NATO non-enlargement, international guarantees of sovereignty and security for Ukraine, and the issues of Crimea and the Donbas to be resolved peacefully down the road. Turkish diplomats were the very skilled mediators.

Yet Ukraine then walked away from the negotiating table, perhaps at UK and US prodding, and adopted the policy of refusing negotiations until Russia was driven out of Ukraine by military action. The conflict then escalated, with Russia annexing not only the two regions of the Donbas (Luhansk and Donetsk), but also Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. Recently, Zelensky inflamed the situation by demanding the severing of Ukrainian links with Russian Orthodox institutions, breaking religious ties of ethnic Russians and many ethnic Ukrainians that date back a millennium.

With both the United States and Russia now warily approaching the negotiating table, the time for mediation is at hand. Possible mediators include the United Nations, Turkiye, Pope Francis, China, and perhaps others, in some combination. The contours of successful mediation are actually clear, as is the basis for a peace settlement.

The main point for mediation is that all parties have legitimate interests and legitimate grievances. Russia wrongly and violently invaded Ukraine. The USA wrongly conspired in the overthrow of Yanukovych in 2014, and then heavily armed Ukraine while pushing NATO enlargement to encircle Russia in the Black Sea. Following Yanukovych, Ukrainian Presidents Petro Poroshenko and Volodymyr Zelensky refused to implement the Minsk II agreement.

Peace will come when the United States backs away from further NATO enlargement towards Russia’s borders; Russia withdraws its military forces from Ukraine and backs away from the unilateral annexation of Ukrainian territory; Ukraine backs away from its attempts to retake Crimea and from its repudiation of the Minsk II framework; and all parties agree to secure the sovereign borders of Ukraine under the UN Charter and backed by the guarantees of the UN Security Council and other nations.

The Ukraine War is an extremely dangerous war between nuclear superpowers in a world desperately in need of peace and cooperation. It is time for the United States and Russia, two great powers of both the past and future, to show their greatness through mutual respect, diplomacy, and common efforts to ensure sustainable development for all — including for the people of Ukraine, who are most urgently in need of peace and reconstruction.

 

Jeffrey D. Sachs is a University Professor and Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University, where he directed The Earth Institute from 2002 until 2016. He is also President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network and a commissioner of the UN Broadband Commission for Development. He has been advisor to three United Nations Secretaries-General, and currently serves as an SDG Advocate under Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

¿Wappin? Looking back, moving ahead / Mirando atrás, avanzando

0
ej
Politicians and captains of industry dithered and lied and invested in war, but people weary from a pandemic, inflation and all the corny tricks wouldn’t shut up. Around the world, we have been through a year of labor militancy, angry women marching to the polls, war, climate disasters and protests. Listen back for some context. Have few things been truly resolved? It’s not yet over. Wikimedia photo by Ivan Radic.

Oldies for an unexpected 2022

Bob Marley – No Woman, No Cry
https://youtu.be/2Dq33kK9nDU

Valeria Ovando & Grupo Tuira – Tu Fuerza de Mujer
https://youtu.be/XCJBN2JskDA

Pete Seeger – Solidarity Forever
https://youtu.be/z9904n5GyTQ

Lesley Gore – You Don’t Own Me
https://youtu.be/e166LIQ5nSg

Aretha Franklin – Respect
https://youtu.be/NVySaEGvv7w

Holly Near – I Ain’t Afraid
https://youtu.be/t2xmbvFEaZE

Paul Robeson – Joe Hill
https://youtu.be/omkexhcca08

Katie White & Mark McGlue – People Get Ready
https://youtu.be/n9gdNMIeY0I

Mark Knopfler – Brothers In Arms
https://youtu.be/hlq4mhgB7cs

Buffy Sainte-Marie – Universal Soldier
https://youtu.be/j6imjvgJFvM

Pablo Milanés – Yo Pisaré las Calles Nuevamente
https://youtu.be/sAI8FPNv6DY

Johnny Cash – I Won’t Back Down
https://youtu.be/O7wIgFqwrhQ

The Corrs – Everybody Hurts
https://youtu.be/7-XHiX62b2E

Victor Jara – Te Recuerdo Amanda
https://youtu.be/tkYvpjYCGZg

Patti Smith – People Have the Power
https://youtu.be/YHz4WakyZ4E

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

22ENGdonateBUTTONTweet

 

CIAM

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

FB CCL

 

$$

 
PDC
 
Dinero

Sanz, Por otro lado…

0
blue sky
Foto de Shutterstock por jesadaphorn.

Las buenas noticias de 2022

por Elena Sanz, The Conversation

“Si crees que eres demasiado pequeño para hacer grandes cosas, intenta dormir con un mosquito en una habitación cerrada”, reza un proverbio africano. En 2022 varias noticias nos confirmaron que no hay que subestimar el poder de los más pequeños, porque pueden hacer cosas enormes. Como ocurre con los hongos que devoran chapapote, el pulpo capaz de producir un veneno que podría derrotar al temido melanoma (el cáncer de piel más común), los gusanos que degradan plástico en solo 40 minutos y el pequeño helecho que podría ayudarnos a revertir el calentamiento global.

Y no son las únicas buenas noticias que nos ha regalado el año que está a punto de acabar, ni mucho menos. Atentos como vivimos a los avances de la neurociencia, en The Conversation tenemos muy presente que compartir los acontecimientos positivos contribuye a la felicidad de nuestros lectores. Eso, y que estamos ávidos de historias.

Por eso, además de poner sobre la mesa la gravedad del actual cambio climático, en los últimos meses también constatamos que no todo está perdido. Resulta que la siembra de agua, técnica ancestral en Sierra Nevada y en los Andes, podría ayudarnos a afrontar la sequía, a la vez que usar ventiladores mastodónticos permitiría extraer miles de toneladas de dióxido de carbono de la atmósfera.

Tampoco es baladí que el pasado verano la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas reconociera por primera vez que el acceso a un medio ambiente sano, adecuado o ecológico es un derecho humano.

Y esto enlaza con una excelente noticia de 2022 para las empresas: ya hay evidencias de que ser sostenible, además de beneficioso para el medio ambiente, es competitivo. Como también lo es apostar por la economía social, que se erige en impulsora de la recuperación económica.

Derechos, adolescencia y escuelas participativas

En 2022 anunciábamos también logros sociales importantes en dos puntos geográficos separados por muchos kilómetros. Por un lado, en España, la igualdad de derechos de las personas empleadas de hogar se convertía por fin en una realidad. Y al otro lado del charco, Cuba empezaba a dejar atrás la homofobia social.

Gracias al concienzudo trabajo de divulgación de quienes escriben a diario en The Conversation entendimos por qué se portan tan mal los niños cuando están cansados, por qué nunca debemos preguntarles a los pequeños de la familia si tienen novia o novio, por qué corren tanto riesgos los adolescentes y por qué nos hacemos amigos de nuestros amigos.

Sin olvidar que empezó a coger forma el sueño de formarnos en escuelas más democráticas y participativas en las que los alumnos no pierdan ni el asombro ni la sonrisa.

Misterios científicos resueltos y avances para un final de película

Por otro lado, en 2022 la ciencia siguió desvelando misterios y demostrando que nos queda mucho por saber. Sin ir más lejos, resolvimos un enigma de la física con nada menos que dos siglos de antigüedad: qué hace que el hielo resbale. Y también entendimos por qué los rayos no descienden al suelo en línea recta sino haciendo zigzag.

Puestos a descifrar enigmas bellos, los científicos explicaron el efecto pétalo de rosa, es decir, el mecanismo por el cuál las esféricas gotitas de rocío se adhieren a los pétalos de la flor más popular del mundo y no se caen, aunque pongamos la flor boca abajo. Asombroso, ¿no?

Boquiabiertos nos dejaron también los hallazgos dentro de la Cueva de las Estegamitas de Málaga, un lugar prácticamente único en el mundo (solo hay 3 cuevas parecidas en Australia, Puerto Rico y Eslovaquia) llamado así porque en su suelo crecen extrañas crestas que se parecen a las que tenían en la espalda los estegosaurios.

Por no hablar de cómo se nos quedó el cuerpo al conocer el Elinvar, una especie de unicornio tecnológico, un nuevo material que parecía imposible, creado por el ser humano utilizando principios que rozan la magia, pero no son más que avances de la ciencia.

Avances que también están permitiendo desarrollar vacunas de nueva generación que eviten que estemos imponiendo eternamente medidas cuando la cosa se pone fea con la covid-19, y poniendo una y otra vez dosis y más dosis de recuerdo. Puede que sean vacunas de mucosas, vacunas nasales o panvacunas, aún no lo sabemos con certeza. Pero parece que conseguirán que la pandemia de covid-19 acabe como merece: con un final “de película”.

Nos despedimos de un año en el que irrumpieron en escena los primeros biofármacos elaborados a partir de heces de personas sanas y empezó a hacer sus pinitos la fotofarmacología, una disciplina emergente que desarrolla fármacos que se activan con luz y no tienen efectos secundarios. Un año en el que avanzamos hacia el diagnóstico precoz del párkinson y el alzhéimer.

En suma, un año cargado de buenas noticias. ¿Es o no para flipar en colores (un millón de tonalidades si eres tricrómata y cien millones si eres tetracrómata)?

No dudamos ni por un instante que en 2023 las buenas nuevas serán como mínimo igual de abundantes. Y desde The Conversation nos comprometemos a contárselas.The Conversation

Elena Sanz, Redactora Jefa / Editora de Salud y Medicina, The Conversation

Este artículo fue publicado originalmente en The Conversation. Lea el original.

Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

Tweet

Dinero
 

CIAM

 

Tweet

 

FB CCL

 

US Justice Department backs Chevron to support private corporate prosecutions

0
Steven Donziger
“This appeal seriously impacts Amazon communities, the rule of law, and free speech,” said environmental lawyer Steven Donziger. “Let’s keep fighting.” Steven Donziger leaving the courthouse after his sentencing. Wikimedia photo by Marisam77, cropped by The Panama News.

Donziger files response to “DOJ’s disastrous decision to side with Chevron”

by Kenny Stancil – Common Dreams

The legal team of human rights attorney Steven Donziger is challenging what he describes as the US Department of Justice’s “disastrous decision to side with Chevron and back private corporate prosecutions.”

At issue is the DOJ’s recently submitted brief in opposition to Donziger’s pending appeal of his widely criticized contempt of court conviction. Donziger’s reply to the Justice Department’s December 16 brief was filed Tuesday at the US Supreme Court.

In 2011, a Donziger-led legal team representing more than 30,000 farmworkers and Indigenous people harmed by over three decades of oil drilling in Ecuador won an $18 billion judgment against Chevron for deliberately dumping more than 16 billion gallons of toxic wastewater and other hazardous pollutants in the delicate Amazonian ecosystem—an act that caused a ” rainforest Chernobyl.” Punitive damages were later reduced to $9.5 billion.

Although the historic ruling against Chevron was upheld by the Ecuadorian Supreme Court, the oil giant moved its operations out of the country to avoid paying for cleanup, alleged that the $9.5 billion settlement had been fraudulently obtained, and launched what six House Democrats described last year as an “unjust legal assault” on Donziger.

In July 2019, US District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the Southern District of New York, a former corporate lawyer with investments in Chevron, held Donziger in contempt of court for refusing to turn over his computer and cellphone, a move that would have disclosed privileged client information.

Soon after, Donziger began his “completely unjust” 993-day detention on a misdemeanor charge that carries a maximum sentence of six months.

Donziger has received support from United Nations human rights experts and nearly 70 Nobel Prize Laureates, including 1997 peace prize recipient Jody Williams, who argued in May 2021 that Donziger’s house arrest and the criminal contempt case against him was a “gross miscarriage of justice” meant to dissuade others from challenging corporations’ human rights violations and ecological crimes.

Along with dozens of other Nobel prize winners, Williams asked US Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Donziger’s predicament, writing that “a high-level review will reveal that the case clearly is a violation of Mr. Donziger’s rights and the rights of the affected communities in Ecuador.”

Garland’s DOJ, however, refused to reassert main jurisdiction over the case. Although the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York chose not to prosecute Donziger’s misdemeanor contempt of court charge, Kaplan hand-picked a right-wing colleague, Judge Loretta Preska, to hear the case.

Kaplan and Preska, previously a leader in the Chevron-funded Federalist Society, then selected Rita Glavin, an attorney at Seward & Kissel LLP, to act as a special prosecutor even though her law partner was a former member of Chevron’s board of directors and Chevron had been one of the firm’s clients as recently as 2018.

Despite the fact that he had already been confined to his home faor 24 months, including more than 20 months pretrial, Donziger was convicted by Preska in July 2021 and later sentenced to six months in federal prison, a term that he finished on house arrest.

Following Donziger’s conviction, Democratic Sens. Ed Markey (M) and Sheldon Whitehouse (RI) sounded the alarm about the use of private prosecutors in the federal court system.

When Donziger was behind bars late last year, nine House Democrats implored Garland to “take immediate action” to secure his release.

“Donziger sits in a crowded federal prison because a Chevron attorney made it so, without executive branch supervision or ever seeing a jury of his peers,” the lawmakers wrote. “As the United States is a party to the district court case against Mr. Donziger, we request that you act immediately to reclaim control of this case, dismiss the charges, and free Mr. Donziger from his imprisonment.”

The DOJ declined to intervene on Donziger’s behalf. So too did US President Joe Biden, who was asked by more than 100 human rights groups to pardon Donziger.

An appeals court upheld Donziger’s conviction in a split decision this June, two months after he was released. In September, Donziger appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court, arguing that the DOJ’s lack of supervision during his prosecution violated the US Constitution’s separation of powers.

Less than two weeks ago, the Justice Department filed a brief in opposition to Donziger’s pending Supreme Court appeal, prompting the environmental lawyer’s Tuesday response.

“Progressive movements rightly saw [Donziger’s case] as an attempt to criminalize corporate accountability, and that hit a nerve,” Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), who was among the progressives pushing for Donziger’s release, toldThe Hill on Tuesday. “If he’s a principled lawyer taking on a powerful corporation and the justice system punishes him, that has a profound chilling effect.”

“We can’t become afraid of fighting for what’s right,” Bowman continued. “Donziger’s work was important. I’m thankful he’s free now, but he shouldn’t have had to fight for that freedom.”

According to The Hill, in interviews, “Donziger expressed concern that he was a test case for what he called the corporate capture of American civil institutions by energy giants like Chevron, with a goal of silencing opposition.”

“The industry’s figured out that if they can control the courts, or at least, influence them to a great degree, they can prevent themselves from being held accountable and obtain effective impunity for their misdeeds, for their wrongdoing, for their pollution, [and] for the harm they cause,” Donziger told the outlet.

“That doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t use our courts,” he added. “We must—there are ways to use them effectively in climate justice—but make no mistake about it, the US federal courts right now are very hostile to climate cases” due to a decades-long Republican campaign to create a judiciary friendly to Big Oil.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC